Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188669›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2024

Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: techniques and outcomes.

Anouar Bourghli, Louis Boissiere, Ibrahim Obeid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anouar BourghliSpine surgery department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Louis BoissiereSpine surgery department, Clinique du Dos, Elsan Jean Villar Private hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Ibrahim ObeidSpine surgery department, Clinique du Dos, Elsan Jean Villar Private hospital, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy has been thoroughly described and studied over the past 2 decades, being applied mainly in the lumbar spine, followed by the thoracic spine. Our better understanding of alignment biomechanics, and the progressive refinements of the surgical technique over time made it a very efficient procedure for the management of fixed sagittal malalignment. However, a long learning curve is mandatory to mitigate the associated risks particularly neurological deficits and achieve satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes with an acceptable rate of complications.

Indexed as

Adult spinal deformityCoronal malalignmentDomino connectorLumbar spinePedicle subtraction osteotomySagittal malalignment

Identifiers

PMID39188669
PMCPMC11345922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.