Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188666›Full record

ArticleAnnals of occupational and environmental medicine2024

Occupation classification model based on DistilKoBERT: using the 5th and 6th Korean Working Condition Surveys.

Tae-Yeon Kim, Seong-Uk Baek, Myeong-Hun Lim, Byungyoon Yun, Domyung Paek, Kyung Ehi Zoh, Kanwoo Youn, Yun Keun Lee, Yangho Kim, Jungwon Kim and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of occupational and environmental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Tae-Yeon KimDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6265-0008
Seong-Uk BaekDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0882-8326
Myeong-Hun LimDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1731-962X
Byungyoon YunDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7055-6424
Domyung PaekDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4510-6362
Kyung Ehi ZohDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2821-070X
Kanwoo YounWonjin Green Hospital Occupational Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9641-9310
Yun Keun LeeWonjin Green Hospital Occupational Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-7665
Yangho KimDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-0829
Jungwon KimDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3836-8890
Eunsuk ChoiCollege of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Innovation, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4622-745X
Mo-Yeol KangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1682-865X
YoonHo ChoOccupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Ulsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5106-3760
Kyung-Eun LeeOccupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Ulsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5112-7747
Juho SimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-4482
Juyeon OhDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9843-4928
Heejoo ParkDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5917-5065
Jian LeeDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9089-895X
Jong-Uk WonDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9200-3297
Yu-Min LeeDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7062-9347
Jin-Ha YoonThe Institute for Occupational Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-2955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate occupation classification is essential in various fields, including policy development and epidemiological studies. This study aims to develop an occupation classification model based on DistilKoBERT. Methods: This study used data from the 5th and 6th Korean Working Conditions Surveys conducted in 2017 and 2020, respectively. A total of 99,665 survey participants, who were nationally representative of Korean workers, were included. We used natural language responses regarding their job responsibilities and occupational codes based on the Korean Standard Classification of Occupations (7th version, 3-digit codes). The dataset was randomly split into training and test datasets in a ratio of 7:3. The occupation classification model based on DistilKoBERT was fine-tuned using the training dataset, and the model was evaluated using the test dataset. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were calculated as evaluation metrics. Results: The final model, which classified 28,996 survey participants in the test dataset into 142 occupational codes, exhibited an accuracy of 84.44%. For the evaluation metrics, the precision, recall, and F1 score of the model, calculated by weighting based on the sample size, were 0.83, 0.84, and 0.83, respectively. The model demonstrated high precision in the classification of service and sales workers yet exhibited low precision in the classification of managers. In addition, it displayed high precision in classifying occupations prominently represented in the training dataset. Conclusions: This study developed an occupation classification system based on DistilKoBERT, which demonstrated reasonable performance. Despite further efforts to enhance the classification accuracy, this automated occupation classification model holds promise for advancing epidemiological studies in the fields of occupational safety and health.

Indexed as

DistilKoBERTFine-tuningJob classificationNatural language process

Identifiers

PMID39188666
PMCPMC11345209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.