ReviewJPRAS open2024
Lip feminization: A review.
Review in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revealing the Perfect Smile: How Philtrum Length Shapes Lip Beauty.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Defining Femininity: Crowdsourced Insights on Gendered Facial Features Across Ethnicities.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Facial feminization involves a broad array of procedures tailored to transgender women, with lip feminization emerging as a crucial element because of its significant impact on gender expression. Despite its importance, there is a dearth of studies singularly dedicated to lip feminization within this demographic. Objectives: This review aimed to consolidate knowledge on various techniques (surgical and nonsurgical), outcomes, and patient satisfaction related to lip feminization, thereby highlighting its integral role in facial feminization and its significance in affirming transgender women's identity. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, MedLine, and Embase databases was conducted, focusing on studies published up to April 18, 2024. Inclusion criteria were centered on articles addressing the techniques and outcomes of lip feminization. A rigorous screening process was applied to identify relevant literature, which was then reviewed for data extraction on techniques, outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction. Results: Among the initial 28 publications, 21 articles remained. These studies provided insights into surgical and nonsurgical techniques for lip feminization and reported high-satisfaction rates within a broader scope of facial feminization surgeries. Notably, specific data on lip feminization were sparse and often extrapolated either from broader facial feminization research or studies on cisgender populations. Conclusion: This review established that lip feminization is a crucial but under researched aspect of gender-affirming care. Recognizing the high-satisfaction rates reported for facial feminization, this study advocated for detailed, procedure-specific research to optimize outcomes for transgender women seeking lip feminization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.