Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188657›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2024

The first 150 consecutive DIEP free flaps: Lessons learnt and a guide to efficiency for the junior plastic surgeon.

Ishaan Thakur, Henry Shepherd, Bish Soliman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ishaan ThakurWestmead Hospital Plastic Surgery Department, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Rd, Westmead, NSW, 2145.
Henry ShepherdWestmead Hospital Plastic Surgery Department, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Rd, Westmead, NSW, 2145.
Bish SolimanWestmead Hospital Plastic Surgery Department, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Rd, Westmead, NSW, 2145.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) free flap is the gold-standard for breast reconstruction but is technically demanding, resource intensive and time-consuming, making it a daunting task for the junior surgeon. Aim: To report the lessons learnt from the experience of a single surgeon performing their first 150 DIEP reconstructions as a guide for junior surgeons. Methods: Data regarding patient demographics and surgical outcomes from April 2021 to October 2022 were collected retrospectively from medical records. Surgical outcomes were analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results: Over 17 months, 150 flaps were completed in 97 patients by the senior author (BS). Operative duration was negatively correlated with case number for unilateral DIEPs (r = -0.73, p < 0.05) and for bilateral DIEPs (r = -0.67, p = 0.14). Raise time and ischaemic time were also negatively correlated with case number (r = -0.82, p < 0.05 and r = -0.79, p < 0.05, respectively). There were 10 complications and no flap losses. Discussion: The data demonstrate an expected improvement in surgical efficiency with increased experience. We describe the key factors contributing to efficiency in our series, such as preoperative CT angiography, surgical markings prior to the day of surgery, a two-team approach with three diathermy sets, flap raise using monopolar diathermy, preference towards choosing a single dominant perforator and early commitment to perforator choice. This case series acts as a guide for the junior plastic surgeon in achieving safe, aesthetic and efficient results when completing free DIEP flap breast reconstructions.

Indexed as

Breast/surgClinical decision makingEfficiencyLearning curvePlastic surgery procedures

Identifiers

PMID39188657
PMCPMC11345896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.