Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188615›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2024

Application value of machine learning models in predicting intraoperative hypothermia in laparoscopic surgery for polytrauma patients.

Kun Zhu, Zi-Xuan Zhang, Miao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kun ZhuThe Second Department of Anesthesia, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China.
Zi-Xuan ZhangDepartment of War Rescue Training, Qingdao Special Servicemen Recuperation Center of PLA Navy, Qingdao 266001, Shandong Province, China.
Miao ZhangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Qingdao Fushan Elderly Apartments, Qingdao 266001, Shandong Province, China. zhangmiaoamiao@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypothermia during laparoscopic surgery in patients with multiple trauma is a significant concern owing to its potential complications. Machine learning models offer a promising approach to predict the occurrence of intraoperative hypothermia.

aimTo investigate the value of machine learning model to predict hypothermia during laparoscopic surgery in patients with multiple trauma.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 220 patients who were admitted with multiple injuries between June 2018 and December 2023. Of these, 154 patients were allocated to a training set and the remaining 66 were allocated to a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, 53 cases experienced intraoperative hypothermia and 101 did not. Logistic regression analysis was used to construct a predictive model of intraoperative hypothermia in patients with polytrauma undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.

resultsComparison of the hypothermia and non-hypothermia groups found significant differences in sex, age, baseline temperature, intraoperative temperature, duration of anesthesia, duration of surgery, intraoperative fluid infusion, crystalloid infusion, colloid infusion, and pneumoperitoneum volume (

conclusionMachine learning effectively predicted intraoperative hypothermia in polytrauma patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, which improved surgical safety and patient recovery.

Indexed as

HypothermiaLaparoscopic surgeryPolytraumaRelated factorRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID39188615
PMCPMC11269995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.