ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2024
Endometrial carcinoma with cervical stromal invasion: Three case reports.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometrial cancer is a kind of well-known tumors of female genitourinary system. Cervical stromal invasion is an adverse factor for poor prognosis of endometrial cancer. There is still controversy regarding the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of cervical stromal invasion of endometrial cancer. The diagnosis of cervical stromal invasion varies significantly between different observers and institutions. We present a limited case series of the particular pattern of endometrial cancer, which infiltrates the cervical stroma and is often overlooked. CASE SUMMARY: We present three cases of endometrial carcinoma with cervical stromal invasion with cancer-free uterine cavity. One patient, a reproductive-aged woman, exhibited irregular menstruation and was diagnosed with endometrial polyps by hysteroscopy and segmental curettage. A MRI scan revealed polypoid nodules within the internal cervical orifice. The other two cases were postmenopausal women who presented with abnormal vaginal bleeding. Hysteroscopy and segmental curettage suggested atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium. MRI scans did not detect any malignant signs in the endometrium. In one case, a non-thickened endometrium was observed, while in another, hyperplasia of the endometrium was seen. Notably, none of these patients had malignant tumors identified in the uterine cavity
conclusionCervical stromal invasion is easily missed if no cancer is found in the uterine body on MRI. Immunohistochemistry of endoscopic curettage specimens should be conducted to avoid underestimation of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.