Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188492›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Recurrent Case of Papillary Eccrine Adenoma.

Renee Chang, Armaan Guraya, Renee Lucero, Paul Shitabata

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Renee ChangDermatology, Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, Henderson, USA.
Armaan GurayaDermatology, Prime West Consortium, Newport Beach, USA.
Renee LuceroDermatology, Prime West Consortium, Newport Beach, USA.
Paul ShitabataDermatopathology, Prime West Consortium, Newport Beach, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Papillary eccrine adenoma (PEA) is a rare benign eccrine gland neoplasm presenting as a solitary nodule, primarily in middle-aged African American females. Accurate histological diagnosis is crucial due to its potential to mimic adnexal carcinomas. Complete excision is recommended due to its risk of local aggression and recurrence. A 75-year-old Caucasian male with a history of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) presented with a recurrent pink, scaly nodule on the right medial pretibial leg area. Initial biopsy showed benign PEA. The lesion recurred after one year, and a re-biopsy confirmed a tubulopapillary adenoma within a scar. The lesion was excised with a 2 mm margin. PEA is characterized histologically by dilated ducts lined by a dual layer of tumor cells, often with intraluminal papillae structures. Immunohistochemical staining aids diagnosis, with markers such as S-100, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) indicating eccrine differentiation. Differential diagnoses include adnexal carcinomas and BCC with eccrine differentiation. Complete excision is necessary to prevent recurrence.

Indexed as

adnexal carcinoma mimiceccrine gland neoplasmpapillary eccrine adenomarecurrencetubopapillary adenoma

Identifiers

PMID39188492
PMCPMC11346817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.