ArticleCureus2024
Delayed Aspiration of Cerebrospinal Fluid From a Thoracic Epidural Catheter After Difficult Placement: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 69-year-old female with Crohn's disease was admitted for open ileocecectomy with lysis of adhesions. The plan was to proceed with general endotracheal anesthesia and a thoracic epidural catheter for perioperative analgesia. Epidural access was attempted at the T10-11 and T11-12 interspaces, both of which resulted in accidental dural punctures. On the third attempt, the epidural catheter was inserted at the T9-10 interspace. Both the aspiration and test dose were negative. Thirty minutes later, after induction of general anesthesia, the catheter was again aspirated before the epidural pump was connected. Freely flowing, glucose-positive fluid was obtained, and the catheter was removed for the patient's safety. This case suggests that accidental dural puncture may be a risk factor for inappropriate communication with the subarachnoid space. This can be assumed to increase the risk of unanticipated high or total spinal block and its life-threatening sequelae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.