Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188464›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Unaccounted Gallbladder.

Sunil Vishwakarma, Chhavindar Singh, Tripti Agarwal, Aditya Sagar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sunil VishwakarmaGeneral Surgery, Motilal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj, IND.
Chhavindar SinghGeneral Surgery, Motilal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj, IND.
Tripti AgarwalGeneral Surgery, Motilal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj, IND.
Aditya SagarGeneral Surgery, Motilal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallbladder agenesis is a rare anatomical variant, and most cases are asymptomatic and diagnosed on autopsy. Few of them may present with features suggestive of biliary tract pathology. A 32-year-old male presented with complaints of intermittent epigastric pain for three months. Abdominal ultrasonography was suggestive of chronic calculous cholecystitis, and he was planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, no gallbladder was found during the surgery. Postoperative evaluation was suggestive of an absent gallbladder with a normal ductal system. A provisional diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction was made based on his symptoms. Congenital absence of gallbladder is a rare anomaly and only a few of the affected individuals are symptomatic. Lack of specific features, coupled with the inability of standard abdominal ultrasonography to detect the absence of gallbladder, can put the treating surgeon in a dilemma intraoperatively. Agenesis of the gallbladder is often missed and this entity should be kept in mind while having difficulty in visualizing the gallbladder. An astute surgeon should be wary of this diagnosis during difficult dissection to avoid bile duct injuries.

Indexed as

acalculous cholecystitisacute calculous cholecystitisagenesis of gall bladdercancer gall bladdercholedocholithiasischolelithiasischronic calculous cholecystitisgall bladder dysmotilitypancreatitissphincter of oddi

Identifiers

PMID39188464
PMCPMC11345654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.