ArticleCureus2024
Silent Sentinel: Incidental Discovery of Gunpowder-Induced Subconjunctival Foreign Bodies Three Years Post-firearm Injury.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gunpowder-related ocular injuries are rare and can present significant diagnostic and management challenges. This case report describes a 27-year-old male who was discovered to have subconjunctival gunpowder foreign bodies during a routine annual medical examination. The patient presented with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20 in both eyes and was asymptomatic, with no complaints of pain, visual disturbances, or other ocular symptoms. Biomicroscopic examination revealed three gunpowder spherules embedded in the inferotemporal bulbar conjunctiva of the right eye, the largest measuring approximately 1.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm. When questioned, the patient recalled a firearm injury from 3 years prior but had never experienced any ocular discomfort or required treatment. Bilateral fundus examination and ultrasound B-scan confirmed the absence of intraocular foreign bodies and an intact scleral wall. Given the patient's asymptomatic presentation, no immediate treatment was recommended. Instead, the patient was advised to return for follow-up if symptoms developed. The case underscores the importance of thorough examination and patient history in determining the appropriate course of action for ocular foreign bodies, especially those related to gunpowder. Despite their high-velocity impact, gunpowder-related foreign bodies are generally well tolerated, suggesting that observation can be a safe approach for asymptomatic cases. Nonetheless, a critical and patient-centered management strategy is essential, with interventions like phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) reserved for cases where foreign bodies cause visual impairment or other complications. This case report highlights the need for individualized treatment plans and suggests that observation can be a viable approach when dealing with asymptomatic ocular foreign bodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.