Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188424›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Comparative Analysis of Mathematical Models and App-Based Measurement for Estimating the Cutaneous Wound Areas of Captive Asian Elephants.

Thyagaraj Giggin, Kurisinkal D Martin, Syam K Vebugopal, Kundukulam S Anil, Arayinkaravattu R Sreeranjini, Mulluparambil K Narayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thyagaraj GigginDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kerala, IND.
Kurisinkal D MartinDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kerala, IND.
Syam K VebugopalDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kerala, IND.
Kundukulam S AnilDepartment of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kerala, IND.
Arayinkaravattu R SreeranjiniDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kerala, IND.
Mulluparambil K NarayananDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kerala, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the variation in the area estimation under different mathematical calculations against measurement by a smartphone application in estimating the cutaneous wound areas in captive Asian elephants. Methods The study was conducted on captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) with cutaneous wounds reported to Veterinary Hospitals of Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University and elephant camps within and outside Kerala state (mostly southern states of India, namely, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) over the period September 2019 to October 2022. Thirty-five clinical cases diagnosed with skin wounds of different aetiologies at various parts of the body were subjected to measurement, and 111 measurements were taken using a smartphone application, Imito Measure (Imito AG, Zurich, Switzerland). Based on the outer wound perimeters hand-marked on the mobile screen over the image taken, Imito Measure calculated the length, width, perimeter, and area. The length and width measurements from this were applied to four mathematical models of wound measurements. Wound surface area calculations were further done by these models and were compared. Results The observed results indicated no significant difference between the five methods of area measurement in all the studied cases since the P > 0.05. Conclusion The findings revealed no significant difference between the five techniques of wound area measurement. From the practical clinical utility point, the smartphone application has an edge over the mathematical methods in animals, especially captive Asian elephants, as it has the major advantage of being non-contact and thus addresses some major welfare concerns.

Indexed as

animal welfarecaptive asian elephantsdigital planimetrymobile applicationsnon-contact measurementsskin injuriessmartphoneswound measurements

Identifiers

PMID39188424
PMCPMC11346670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.