Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188412›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

Balance chiropractic therapy for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial.

Wenxiong Li, Yaxin Chang, Qi Feng, Yan Cheng, Jichao Yin, Yindi Sun, Feng Yang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02705131 (Balance Chiropractic Therapy for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02705131 naunknown statusnot on this map

Balance Chiropractic Therapy for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: a Randomized Parallel-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFeng YangRan2016 to 2017Enrolled240ConditionsCervical RadiculopathyArmsBalance Chiropractic Therapy, Traction Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenxiong LiShaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi'an, 712000, China.
Yaxin ChangShaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi'an, 712000, China.
Qi FengShaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi'an, 712000, China.
Yan ChengShaanxi Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Xi'an, 710003, China.
Jichao YinXi'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xi'an, 710021, China.
Yindi SunXi'an Honghui Hospital, 710000, China.
Feng YangShaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi'an, 712000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness of the balance chiropractic therapy (BCT) compared with traction therapy (TT) for patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Methods: Subjects were enrolled from four hospitals. Eligible patients will be randomized to one of the two arms: the treatment group and the control group. In the treatment group, patients received the BCT for 20 days, while patients in the control group received TT. Patients visited the physician at 1- and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was pain severity measured with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included cervical curvature measured using the Borden method, a composite of functional status measured by the Neck Disability Index (NDI), patient health status (evaluated by the SF-36 health survey) and adverse events (AEs) as reported in the trial. Results: Of the 240 randomly assigned patients, 120 participants were assigned to the BCT and 120 to the TT. 231 (96.3 %) provided follow-up data at 1 and 3 months. There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05), indicating good comparability. According to the results, after BCT and TT treatment, the pain VAS score, cervical curvature, NDI scores and SF-36 scores of two groups was significantly improved (P < 0.05). Furthermore, at 20 days of treatment and 1 and 3 months of follow-up, the participants in the BCT group showed superior treatment outcomes on both primary and secondary measures. Conclusion: The BCT may be a novel strategy for the treatment of the cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02705131. Registered on March 10, 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02705131?cond=NCT02705131&rank=1&tab=table.

Indexed as

Balance chiropractic therapyCervical spondylotic radiculopathyRandomized controlled trialTraction therapy

Identifiers

PMID39188412
PMCPMC11345501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.