Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188408›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024

Reduced lateralization of the language network in the blind and its relationship with white matter tract neuroanatomy.

Gabriela Dzięgiel-Fivet, Katarzyna Jednoróg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriela Dzięgiel-FivetLaboratory of Language Neurobiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszaw, Poland.
Katarzyna JednorógLaboratory of Language Neurobiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several previous studies reported reduced leftward lateralization in blind participants' samples compared to the sighted population. The origins of this difference remain unknown. Here, we tested whether functional lateralization is connected with the structural characteristics of white matter tracts [corpus callosum (CC), uncinate fasciculus (UF), and superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF)], as suggested by previous studies conducted in the typical sighted population. Twenty-three blind and 21 sighted adult participants were tested during fMRI with a semantic decision paradigm presented both auditorily and in the modality appropriate for reading (tactually for the blind and visually for the sighted). Lateralization indices (LI) were calculated based on the activations. The fractional anisotropy (FA) measure was extracted from the white matter tracts of interest. Correlation analyses testing the relationship between FA and LI were conducted. The reduced leftward lateralization of both speech processing and reading-related activations was replicated. Nevertheless, the relationship between the structural integrity of the CC and LI and between the asymmetry of the intrahemispheric tracts and LI was not confirmed, possibly due to the lack of power. The sources of the reduced lateralization of the language network in the sensory-deprived population remain unknown. Further studies should account for environmental variables (e.g., the frequency of contact with written language) and the complexity of the factors that may influence the functional lateralization of the human brain.

Indexed as

blindcorpus callosumFAfMRIlateralizationreadingspeech-processingwhite matter

Identifiers

PMID39188408
PMCPMC11345183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.