ArticleBioactive materials2024
Personalized composite scaffolds for accelerated cell- and growth factor-free craniofacial bone regeneration.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolism of citrate-mediated PI3K-Akt signaling and primary cilium regulates spatiotemporal craniofacial mineralization.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Hydrogel coatings for titanium implants: From smart stimuli-responsive strategies to multimodal bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Soft, Reactive, and Alive: A Dynamic Framework for Degradation and Functional Stability of Polymeric Biomaterials.Polymers · 2026Review
- A low-cost imaging platform for quantitative characterisation of scaffold surface macrotopography with potential application in craniofacial tissue engineering.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Design Strategies to Target Joint Resident Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Osteochondral Regeneration.Cells · 2026Review
- Simultaneous regeneration of skin and bone in full-thickness cranial composite defects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Multidimensional bibliometric analysis and global trends in the nervous system's role in bone regeneration.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Modular assembly of nanocomposite hydrogel with NIR-responsive black phosphorus release and mild photothermal synergy for enhanced regenerative microenvironment and accelerated infectious bone repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Polyphenol mediated zinc-oxygen synergistic hydrogel remodels senescent microenvironment for periodontal tissue regeneration.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A Native Bioactive Interface Functionalized with Osteoprogenitor Stem Cell-Derived Migrasomes for Enhanced Bone Regeneration.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Advances in Composite Bioactive Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Repair: Implications for Oral Surgery.Brazilian dental journal · 2026Review
- hADMSC-YTZP seeding improves peri-implant bone repair through increased expression of BMP-2, ALP, and OPG.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microtopography-induced changes in cell nucleus morphology enhance bone regeneration by modulating the cellular secretome.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Graphene Oxide in Bone Regenerative Engineering: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.ACS bio & med chem Au · 2025Review
- Enhanced Osteogenic Differentiation of hMSCs Using BMP@ZIF-8-Loaded GelMA Nanocomposite Hydrogels with Controlled BMP-2 Release.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Highly Elastic, Biodegradable Polyester-Based Citrate Rubber for 3D Printing in Regenerative Engineering.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Effective Bone Tissue Fabrication Using 3D-Printed Citrate-Based Nanocomposite Scaffolds Laden with BMP9-Stimulated Human Urine Stem Cells.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Assisted Development of Injectable, Mechanically Robust, and Energy Metabolism-Modulating Brushite Cements.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Strategies for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering: Innovations for Scalable Bone Regeneration.Plastic and aesthetic research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Approaches to regenerating bone often rely on integrating biomaterials and biological signals in the form of cells or cytokines. However, from a translational point of view, these approaches are challenging due to the sourcing and quality of the biologic, unpredictable immune responses, complex regulatory paths, and high costs. We describe a simple manufacturing process and a material-centric 3D-printed composite scaffold system (CSS) that offers distinct advantages for clinical translation. The CSS comprises a 3D-printed porous polydiolcitrate-hydroxyapatite composite elastomer infused with a polydiolcitrate-graphene oxide hydrogel composite. Using a micro-continuous liquid interface production 3D printer, we fabricate a precise porous ceramic scaffold with 60 wt% hydroxyapatite resembling natural bone. The resulting scaffold integrates with a thermoresponsive hydrogel composite
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.