Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188310›Full record

ArticleISME communications2024

Co-inoculations of bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi often drive additive plant growth responses.

Louis Berrios, Andressa M Venturini, Tillson Bertie Ansell, Esther Tok, William Johnson, Claire E Willing, Kabir G Peay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louis BerriosDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 327 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3888-9928
Andressa M VenturiniDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 327 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5901-1658
Tillson Bertie AnsellDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 327 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4870-5387
Esther TokDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 327 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7283-1747
William JohnsonOceans Department, Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, 120 Ocean View Blvd., Pacific Grove, CA 93950, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5857-8091
Claire E WillingSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7563-242X
Kabir G PeayDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 327 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7998-7412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlled greenhouse studies have shown the numerous ways that soil microbes can impact plant growth and development. However, natural soil communities are highly complex, and plants interact with many bacterial and fungal taxa simultaneously. Due to logistical challenges associated with manipulating more complex microbiome communities, how microbial communities impact emergent patterns of plant growth therefore remains poorly understood. For instance, do the interactions between bacteria and fungi generally yield additive (i.e. sum of their parts) or nonadditive, higher order plant growth responses? Without this information, our ability to accurately predict plant responses to microbial inoculants is weakened. To address these issues, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the type (additive or higher-order, nonadditive interactions), frequency, direction (positive or negative), and strength that bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi (arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal) have on six phenotypic plant growth responses. Our results demonstrate that co-inoculations of bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi tend to have positive additive effects on many commonly reported plant responses. However, ectomycorrhizal plant shoot height responds positively and nonadditively to co-inoculations of bacteria and ectomycorrhizal fungi, and the strength of additive effects also differs between mycorrhizae type. These findings suggest that inferences from greenhouse studies likely scale to more complex field settings and that inoculating plants with diverse, beneficial microbes is a sound strategy to support plant growth.

Indexed as

bacteria-mycorrhizal fungi interactionsbioinoculantsmeta-analysismicrobial ecologytripartite interactions

Identifiers

PMID39188310
PMCPMC11346365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.