ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
CineVN: Variational network reconstruction for rapid functional cardiac cine MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time, Inline Quantitative MRI Enabled by Scanner-Integrated Machine Learning: A Proof of Principle With NODDI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstruction to Improve End-Diastolic and Systolic Cardiac T1 Mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Hybrid learning: a combination of self-supervised and supervised learning for joint MRI reconstruction and denoising in low-field MRI.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- A Spatio-Temporal Diffusion Model for Cardiac Real-Time Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Exercise MRI stress testing of the human heart at 3 Tesla: measurement precision of biventricular function and aortic blood flow during steady-state bicycling exercise.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Multi-dynamic deep image prior for cardiac MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Advancing MRI Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Deep Learning and Compressed Sensing Integration.ArXiv · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a reconstruction method for highly accelerated cardiac cine MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution and low temporal blurring, and to demonstrate accurate estimation of ventricular volumes and myocardial strain in healthy subjects and in patients.
methodsThe proposed method, called CineVN, employs a spatiotemporal Variational Network combined with conjugate gradient descent for optimized data consistency and improved image quality. The method is first evaluated on retrospectively undersampled cine MRI data in terms of image quality. Then, prospectively accelerated data are acquired in 18 healthy subjects both segmented over two heartbeats per slice as well as in real time with 1.6 mm isotropic resolution. Ventricular volumes and strain parameters are computed and compared to a compressed sensing reconstruction and to a conventional reference cine MRI acquisition. Lastly, the method is demonstrated in 46 patients and ventricular volumes and strain parameters are evaluated.
resultsCineVN outperformed compressed sensing in image quality metrics on retrospectively undersampled data. Functional parameters and myocardial strain were the most accurate for CineVN compared to two state-of-the-art compressed sensing methods.
conclusionDeep learning-based reconstruction using our proposed method enables accurate evaluation of cardiac function in real-time cine MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution. This has the potential to improve cardiac imaging particularly for patients with arrhythmia or impaired breath-hold capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.