ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024
Innovative Application of the Ilizarov Technique for Long Nerve Defect Reconstruction: A Detailed Case Report.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstructive Techniques and Outcomes for Large (≥4 cm) Peripheral Nerve Defects: A Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Mechanotransduction and musculoskeletal regeneration: Molecular mechanisms and interdisciplinary applications.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Limb Reconstruction-A New Paradigm in Orthopedic Development.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraditionally known for bone regeneration, the Ilizarov technique's effectiveness in nerve reconstruction, particularly for extensive nerve damage, has yet to be widely recognized. CASE PRESENTATION: This report presents a case study and proposes the innovative use of the Ilizarov technique for reconstructing extended nerve defects. In this study, we reviewed a 43-year-old male diagnosed with an open fracture of the right tibia combined with soft tissue injury resulting in a mangled injury in which a large part of his right tibial bone and nerve were lost. The patient was cured and the sensorimotor function was recovered after distraction osteogenesis by the Ilizarov technique, which is a unique application of this technique to repair a substantial long nerve defect, a rare occurrence in medical literature. It highlights the method of nerve lengthening, which is achieved by attaching the nerve stump to the bone stump. This approach allows for significant nerve regeneration and ensures a stable progression of the nerve, as the bone stump acts as a carrier, overcoming the challenges of direct nerve lengthening.
conclusionsThe adaptability and effectiveness of the Ilizarov technique in a new area suggests the need to reconsider traditional approaches to complex nerve reconstruction. Placing this case within the context of current medical knowledge underscores the potential of this technique to revolutionize the treatment of extended nerve defects, offering hope for improved outcomes in challenging scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.