Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Phase II Clinical Chemoprevention Trial of Weekly Erlotinib before Bladder Cancer Surgery.
Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We performed a clinical trial in patients with non-muscle-invasive (NMI) urothelial cancer randomized (2:1) to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib or placebo (either orally once weekly × 3 doses prior to scheduled surgery) to assess for a difference in EGFR phosphorylation in tumor-adjacent normal urothelium <24 hours post-study dose and tolerance of weekly erlotinib therapy. Thirty-seven volunteers (6 female/31 male; mean age 70; 35 White/2 non-White) with confirmed or suspected NMI urothelial cancer were enrolled into either erlotinib (n = 24; 900 mg-13, 600 mg-11) or placebo (n = 13). IHC assessment of phosphorylated and total EGFR in tumor-adjacent normal urothelium (20 erlotinib and 9 placebo subjects) or tumor (21 erlotinib and 11 placebo subjects) at study end showed no significant difference between those receiving erlotinib or placebo. This was also true for other assessed tissue biomarkers (phosphorylated ERK, ERK, E-cadherin, p53, and Ki67). Adverse events were more common, in a dose-related fashion, in participants receiving erlotinib, e.g., 38% experienced grade 1 with rare grade 2 diarrhea and skin toxicity versus 8% in placebo. Clinically insignificant but statistically significant (P = 0.001) elevations in serum total bilirubin and creatinine were observed in participants receiving erlotinib. Serum erlotinib and metabolite concentrations (OSI-420) confirmed compliance in all subjects receiving erlotinib and did not significantly differ between the 600 and 900 mg doses. Despite compelling preclinical and clinical data for targeted EGFR inhibition in bladder cancer prevention, these data do not support the use of weekly erlotinib therapy to prevent progression of NMI bladder cancer. Prevention Relevance: We evaluated the potential of erlotinib in preventing cancer by performing a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of weekly erlotinib therapy in participants undergoing surgical removal of suspected noninvasive bladder neoplasia. Weekly erlotinib therapy was tolerated with common grade 1 to 2 toxicities but without evidence of beneficial effect upon urothelial tissue. See related Spotlight, p. 7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.