Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187855›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Randomised controlled trial of a psychotherapeutic intervention to improve quality of life and other outcomes in people who repeatedly self-harm: FReSH START study protocol.

K Farley, B Copsey, A Wright-Hughes, A Farrin, C Bojke, D McMillan, C D Graham, R Mattock, C A Brennan, C Gates and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

K FarleyUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, UK.
B CopseyUniversity of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds, UK.
A Wright-HughesUniversity of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds, UK.
A FarrinUniversity of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds, UK.
C BojkeUniversity of Leeds Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.
D McMillanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
C D GrahamUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
R MattockUniversity of Leeds Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.
C A BrennanUniversity of Leeds Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK. c.a.brennan@leeds.ac.uk.
C GatesLeeds Beckett University - City Campus: Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
A MartinUniversity of Leeds Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.
A DowseUniversity of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds, UK.
J HorrocksBionical Emas, Mercia Marina, Willington, UK.
A O HouseUniversity of Leeds Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.
E A GuthrieUniversity of Leeds Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-harm is a major public health challenge, and repeated self-harm is common in those attending hospital following an episode. Evidence suggests psychological interventions could help people who self-harm, but few definitive studies have assessed their clinical and cost-effectiveness. Repeated self-harm is associated with poor quality of life, depression, suicide and increased health service costs which justify the development of psychotherapeutic interventions tailored for people with repeated self-harm.

methodsFReSH START is a multicentre individually 1:1 randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of standard care plus psychological therapy or standard care alone for adults (≥ 18 years) presenting at an emergency department (ED) with repeated self-harm. Recruiting 630 participants, it includes an internal pilot, economic evaluation and process evaluation. The intervention will be delivered by mental health staff working in acute settings, with experience of assessing and managing risk in people presenting to emergency services with self-harm. Staff will be trained and supervised to deliver one of three specially adapted therapies: psychodynamic interpersonal therapy, cognitive behavioural therapy or acceptance and commitment therapy. Participants allocated to the intervention will receive one of the adapted therapies according to therapist allocation for up to 6 months via 12 weekly, one to one, 45-50-min sessions. The primary outcome is quality of life measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure at 12 months post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes include suicidal intent, depression and cost-effectiveness. Data are collected using hospital attendance records and online/postal/telephone questionnaires at 6 and 12 months post-randomisation, with resource use additionally collected at 3 and 9 months. DISCUSSION: This protocol outlines a randomised controlled trial to investigate whether modified therapies are cost-effective and improve quality of life for people who repeatedly self-harm. Few interventions are proven to be deliverable in the NHS for this population. This study is strengthened by the involvement of qualified mental health workers experienced in managing risk as therapists.

trial registrationRegistered on August 03, 2021. IRAS number: 297939. ISRCTN: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN73357210 . REC reference: 21/EE/0145. SPONSOR: University of Leeds.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdultEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPsychotherapyPsychotherapy, PsychodynamicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeMental healthSelf-harmSuicideTalking therapies

Identifiers

PMID39187855
PMCPMC11346196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.