Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187802›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

Assessing peri-implant bacterial community structure: the effect of microbiome sample collection method.

Eduardo Anitua, Alia Murias-Freijo, Roberto Tierno, Ricardo Tejero, Mohammad Hamdan Alkhraisat

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03554876 (Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Bacterial Adhesion on Multi-Im® Transepithelial Components Placed on Implants), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03554876 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Bacterial Adhesion on Multi-Im® Transepithelial Components Placed on Implants

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación Eduardo AnituaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled17ConditionsBiofilm FormationArmsMulti-Im Machined transepithelial component., Multi-Im Nanogolden transepithelial component, Multi-Im Ti-Golden transepithelial component
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eduardo AnituaBTI-Biotechnology Institute, Vitoria, Spain. eduardo@fundacioneduardoanitua.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8386-5303
Alia Murias-Freijo *University Institute for Regenerative Medicine & Oral Implantology, UIRMI (UPV/EHU-Fundación Eduardo Anitua), Jacinto Quincoces, 39, Vitoria (Álava), 01007, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6096-1774
Roberto Tierno *BTI-Biotechnology Institute, Vitoria, Spain.
Ricardo TejeroBTI-Biotechnology Institute, Vitoria, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5260-5042
Mohammad Hamdan AlkhraisatBTI-Biotechnology Institute, Vitoria, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4422-4527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral microbiota comprises polymicrobial communities shaped by mutualistic coevolution with the host, contributing to homeostasis and regulating immune function. Nevertheless, dysbiosis of oral bacterial communities is associated with a number of clinical symptoms that ranges from infections to oral cancer. Peri-implant diseases are biofilm-associated inflammatory conditions affecting the soft and hard tissues around dental implants. Characterization and identification of the biofilm community are essential for the understanding of the pathophysiology of such diseases. For that sampling methods should be representative of the biofilm communities Therefore, there is a need to know the effect of different sampling strategies on the biofilm characterization by next generation sequencing.

methodsWith the aim of selecting an appropriate microbiome sampling procedure for periimplant biofilms, next generation sequencing was used for characterizing the bacterial communities obtained by three different sampling strategies two months after transepithelial abutment placement: adjacent periodontal crevicular fluid (ToCF), crevicular fluid from transepithelial abutment (TACF) and transepithelial abutment (TA).

resultsSignificant differences in multiple alpha diversity indices were detected at both the OTU and the genus level between different sampling procedures. Differentially abundant taxa were detected between sample collection strategies, including peri-implant health and disease related taxa. At the community level significant differences were also detected between TACF and TA and also between TA and ToCF. Moreover, differential network properties and association patterns were identified.

conclusionsThe selection of sample collection strategy can significantly affect the community composition and structure.

trial registrationThis research is part of a randomized clinical trial that was designed to assess the effect of transepithelial abutment surface on the biofilm formation. The trial was registered at Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT03554876.

Indexed as

BiofilmsDental ImplantsGingival Crevicular FluidMicrobiotaAgedBacteriaFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpecimen HandlingDental ImplantsCrevicular fluidDiversityMetagenomicsOral microbiotaTransepithelial abutment

Identifiers

PMID39187802
PMCPMC11348724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.