Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187781›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Pan-immune-inflammation value: a new prognostic index in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Wenjing Liao, Jia Li, Wangyou Feng, Weina Kong, Yujie Shen, Zijun Chen, Hong Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenjing LiaoDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Xijing Hospital, 15 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Jia LiDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Xijing Hospital, 15 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Wangyou FengDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Xijing Hospital, 15 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Weina KongDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Xijing Hospital, 15 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Yujie ShenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Xijing Hospital, 15 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Zijun ChenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Xijing Hospital, 15 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Hong YangDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Xijing Hospital, 15 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China. yanghongdoc@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the deadliest gynaecological malignancies worldwide. The aim of this retrospective study was to create a predictive scoring model based on simple immunological and inflammatory parameters to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EOC.

methodsWe obtained 576 EOC patients and randomly assigned them to the training set (n = 405) and the validation set (n = 171) in a ratio of 7:3. We retrospectively evaluated the association between PIV and OS and PFS using a novel immunoinflammatory marker, according to the optihmal treshold of PIV, we divided the patients into two different subgroups, high PIV (PIV > 254.9) and low PIV (PIV ≤ 254.9). Pan-immune Inflammatory Value (PIV) was computed as follows: neutrophil count (10

resultsThere was a significant difference in survival outcomes between high PIV (PIV > 310.2) and low PIV (PIV ≤ PIV310.2) (3-year survival rates of 61.34% and 76.71%, respectively); 5-year OS, 25.21% and 51.14%, respectively; 3-year PFS, 40.90% and 65.30%; 5-year PFS, 19.33% and 39.73%, respectively). Column plots of OS and PFS were constructed using independent prognostic factors. In the training module, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year AUCs for OS and PFS column charts were 0.713, 0.796, 0.839, and 0.730, 0.799, 0.826, respectively.In the validation cohort, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year AUCs for OS and PFS column charts were 0.676, 0.803, 0.685, and 0.700, respectively, 0.754, 0.727. The calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted survival and actual observations. The decision analysis curves also showed that the current model has good accuracy and clinical applicability. 3-year OS was 61.34% and 76.71%, respectively; 5-year OS was 25.21% and 51.14%, respectively; 3-year PFS was 40.90% and 65.30%, respectively; 5-year PFS was 19.33% and 39.73%, respectively.

conclusionsWe constructed and validated a PIV-based nomogram to predict OS and PFS in EOC patients, with a view to helping gynaecologists converge on oncologists in their treatment and follow-up expertise in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansInflammationKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeutrophilsPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorEpithelial ovarian cancerNomogramPIVPrognosisRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID39187781
PMCPMC11345988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.