Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187772›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024

From vaccine hesitancy to vaccine motivation: A motivational interviewing based approach to vaccine counselling.

Arnaud Gagneur, Damara Gutnick, Patrick Berthiaume, Alessandro Diana, Stephen Rollnick, Prantik Saha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Continuing as Partners in Immunization: Building Immunization Confidence Through Communication, Education, and Resources.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Motivational Interviewing is "Journal of patient experience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arnaud GagneurDepartment of Pediatrics, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Damara GutnickDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Patrick BerthiaumeLes Formations Perspective Santé, Quebec, Canada.
Alessandro DianaIUMFE - Institute of Primary care Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stephen RollnickPsychology, School of Medicine in Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Prantik SahaVagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted Vaccine Hesitancy (VH) as an accelerating global phenomenon that must be addressed. According to the WHO, thirty to fifty percent of the world's population are VH. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based communication style demonstrated to significantly reduce VH. MI guides people toward change through the expression of empathy and by respecting an individual's autonomy. Healthcare providers (HCPs) are the primary implementors of vaccine policies and the most trusted advisors and influencers of vaccination intention at the individual patient level. Training HCPs in MI is one of the most effective strategies to overcome VH. Many countries are currently implementing HCP training programs and population-based MI interventions to improve vaccine uptake. MI conversations are 'the heart' of vaccine decision-making processes. Understanding individual patient-level drivers of hesitancy allows clinicians to efficiently provide tailored, accurate information that reinforces a person's own motivation and confidence in their own decision. This paper describes a 4-step practical framework designed to support HCPs in their dialogue with vaccine-hesitant patients. (1)

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelMotivationMotivational InterviewingVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCounselingDecision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccinescounselinghealthcare providersMotivational interviewingvaccinevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID39187772
PMCPMC11352791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.