Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187703›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

A 3D Convolutional Neural Network Based on Non-enhanced Brain CT to Identify Patients with Brain Metastases.

Tony Felefly, Ziad Francis, Camille Roukoz, Georges Fares, Samir Achkar, Sandrine Yazbeck, Antoine Nasr, Manal Kordahi, Fares Azoury, Dolly Nehme Nasr and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tony FeleflyRadiation Oncology Department, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon. tony.felefly@hotmail.com.
Ziad FrancisPhysics Department, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Camille RoukozRadiation Oncology Department, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Georges FaresRadiation Oncology Department, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Samir AchkarRadiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Sandrine YazbeckDepartment of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W Baltimore St S, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Antoine NasrForethought.AI, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Manal KordahiPathology Department, Centre Hospitalier Affilié Universitaire Régional, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Fares AzouryRadiation Oncology Department, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Dolly Nehme NasrRadiation Oncology Department, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Elie NasrRadiation Oncology Department, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Georges NoëlRadiotherapy Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg (ICANS), 67200, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

Conseil de la Recherche de l'Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth FS157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dedicated brain imaging for cancer patients is seldom recommended in the absence of symptoms. There is increasing availability of non-enhanced CT (NE-CT) of the brain, mainly owing to a wider utilization of Positron Emission Tomography-CT (PET-CT) in cancer staging. Brain metastases (BM) are often hard to diagnose on NE-CT. This work aims to develop a 3D Convolutional Neural Network (3D-CNN) based on brain NE-CT to distinguish patients with and without BM. We retrospectively included NE-CT scans for 100 patients with single or multiple BM and 100 patients without brain imaging abnormalities. Patients whose largest lesion was < 5 mm were excluded. The largest tumor was manually segmented on a matched contrast-enhanced T1 weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and shape radiomics were extracted to determine the size and volume of the lesion. The brain was automatically segmented, and masked images were normalized and resampled. The dataset was split into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Multiple versions of a 3D-CNN were developed, and the best model was selected based on accuracy (ACC) on the validation set. The median largest tumor Maximum-3D-Diameter was 2.29 cm, and its median volume was 2.81 cc. Solitary BM were found in 27% of the patients, while 49% had > 5 BMs. The best model consisted of 4 convolutional layers with 3D average pooling layers, dropout layers of 50%, and a sigmoid activation function. Mean validation ACC was 0.983 (SD: 0.020) and mean area under receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.983 (SD: 0.023). Sensitivity was 0.983 (SD: 0.020). We developed an accurate 3D-CNN based on brain NE-CT to differentiate between patients with and without BM. The model merits further external validation.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImaging, Three-DimensionalNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBrain metastasesConvolutional Neural NetworkDeep learningNon-enhanced CT

Identifiers

PMID39187703
PMCPMC11950574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.