Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187702›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

The Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Extracting the Progressive Bone Metastasis from Unstructured Radiology Reports.

Noriko Kanemaru, Koichiro Yasaka, Nana Fujita, Jun Kanzawa, Osamu Abe

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noriko KanemaruDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0864-7154
Koichiro YasakaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. koyasaka@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0324-6562
Nana FujitaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4314-5475
Jun KanzawaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8203-8665
Osamu AbeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1180-2629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of patients with impending bone metastasis is crucial for prognosis improvement. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a fine-tuned, locally run large language model (LLM) in extracting patients with bone metastasis in unstructured Japanese radiology report and to compare its performance with manual annotation. This retrospective study included patients with "metastasis" in radiological reports (April 2018-January 2019, August-May 2022, and April-December 2023 for training, validation, and test datasets of 9559, 1498, and 7399 patients, respectively). Radiologists reviewed the clinical indication and diagnosis sections of the radiological report (used as input data) and classified them into groups 0 (no bone metastasis), 1 (progressive bone metastasis), and 2 (stable or decreased bone metastasis). The data for group 0 was under-sampled in training and test datasets due to group imbalance. The best-performing model from the validation set was subsequently tested using the testing dataset. Two additional radiologists (readers 1 and 2) were involved in classifying radiological reports within the test dataset for testing purposes. The fine-tuned LLM, reader 1, and reader 2 demonstrated an accuracy of 0.979, 0.996, and 0.993, sensitivity for groups 0/1/2 of 0.988/0.947/0.943, 1.000/1.000/0.966, and 1.000/0.982/0.954, and time required for classification (s) of 105, 2312, and 3094 in under-sampled test dataset (n = 711), respectively. Fine-tuned LLM extracted patients with bone metastasis, demonstrating satisfactory performance that was comparable to or slightly lower than manual annotation by radiologists in a noticeably shorter time.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerLarge Language ModelsNeoplasm MetastasisBone and BonesDatasets as TopicHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedJapanRadiation OncologistsTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone metastasisDeep learningLarge language model

Identifiers

PMID39187702
PMCPMC11950591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.