ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
The Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Extracting the Progressive Bone Metastasis from Unstructured Radiology Reports.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic performance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Performance of multimodal large language models for the detection and characterization of bone lesions on radiographs.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Extracting Pretreatment Pancreatic Cancer According to Computed Tomography Radiology Reports.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- ModernBERT is more efficient than conventional BERT for chest CT findings classification in Japanese radiology reports.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Insufficient reporting quality in large language model studies in the field of radiology.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Role of Model Size and Prompting Strategies in Extracting Labels from Free-Text Radiology Reports with Open-Source Large Language Models.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: evaluation with super resolution deep learning reconstruction : Research.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of a large language model in classifying branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Fine-Tuned Large Language Model in CT Protocol Assignment as Clinical Decision-Supporting System.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Classification of Interventional Radiology Reports into Technique Categories with a Fine-Tuned Large Language Model.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Generative artificial intelligence, large language models and ChatGPT in musculoskeletal Oncology: Current applications and future potential.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Fine-tuned large Language model for extracting newly identified acute brain infarcts based on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging reports.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Data extraction from free-text stroke CT reports using GPT-4o and Llama-3.3-70B: the impact of annotation guidelines.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of patients with impending bone metastasis is crucial for prognosis improvement. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a fine-tuned, locally run large language model (LLM) in extracting patients with bone metastasis in unstructured Japanese radiology report and to compare its performance with manual annotation. This retrospective study included patients with "metastasis" in radiological reports (April 2018-January 2019, August-May 2022, and April-December 2023 for training, validation, and test datasets of 9559, 1498, and 7399 patients, respectively). Radiologists reviewed the clinical indication and diagnosis sections of the radiological report (used as input data) and classified them into groups 0 (no bone metastasis), 1 (progressive bone metastasis), and 2 (stable or decreased bone metastasis). The data for group 0 was under-sampled in training and test datasets due to group imbalance. The best-performing model from the validation set was subsequently tested using the testing dataset. Two additional radiologists (readers 1 and 2) were involved in classifying radiological reports within the test dataset for testing purposes. The fine-tuned LLM, reader 1, and reader 2 demonstrated an accuracy of 0.979, 0.996, and 0.993, sensitivity for groups 0/1/2 of 0.988/0.947/0.943, 1.000/1.000/0.966, and 1.000/0.982/0.954, and time required for classification (s) of 105, 2312, and 3094 in under-sampled test dataset (n = 711), respectively. Fine-tuned LLM extracted patients with bone metastasis, demonstrating satisfactory performance that was comparable to or slightly lower than manual annotation by radiologists in a noticeably shorter time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.