ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Predicting Pathological Characteristics of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer from Ultrasound Images: a Deep Ensemble Approach.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning and Radiomics in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Predicting Long-Term Prognosis and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective is to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing ultrasound images in identifying critical prognostic biomarkers for HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2 + BC). This study enrolled 512 female patients diagnosed with HER2-positive breast cancer through pathological validation at our institution from January 2016 to December 2021. Five distinct deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) and a deep ensemble (DE) approach were trained to classify axillary lymph node involvement (ALNM), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and histological grade (HG). The efficacy of the models was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, areas under the ROC curve (AUCs), and heat maps. DeLong test was applied to compare differences in AUC among different models. The deep ensemble approach, as the most effective model, demonstrated AUCs and accuracy of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.802-0.936) and 69.7% in LVI, 0.973 (95% CI: 0.949-0.998) and 73.8% in HG, thus providing superior classification performance in the context of imbalanced data (p < 0.05 by the DeLong test). On ALNM, AUC and accuracy were 0.780 (95% CI: 0.688-0.873) and 77.5%, which were comparable to other single models. The pretreatment US-based DE model could hold promise as a clinical guidance for predicting pathological characteristics of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, thereby providing benefit of facilitating timely adjustments in treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.