ArticleNature medicine2024
Not all AI health tools with regulatory authorization are clinically validated.
Article in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of malignant digestive tract tumors: focusing on opportunities and challenges in endoscopy and pathology.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- A five-phase evaluation framework for diagnostic and predictive medical artificial intelligence.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- From digital bench to bedside: exaggerated risks, realistic expectations, and genuine challenges of medical AI.European radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in oncology: linking biological discovery to clinical utility.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Toward trustworthy healthcare AI: designing academic research for translation readiness.Molecular systems biology · 2026Review
- Clinical Evidence and FDA Recalls of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals show high AI enthusiasm but limited knowledge: A cross-sectional study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Ethical Considerations in Patient Privacy and Data Handling for AI in Cardiovascular Imaging and Radiology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Moving beyond the benchmarks: Five foundational principles for meaningful AI evaluation in healthcare.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Show us the evidence for the value of medical AI.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Clarifying validation terminologies in healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Perceived Potential and Challenges of Supporting Coronary Artery Disease Treatment Decisions With AI: Qualitative Study.JMIR cardio · 2026Article
- Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy and Technical Feasibility of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Rib Fracture Detection on Chest Radiographs: Observational Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Observational
- Beyond models: a paradigm shift toward human-centered AI system design.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Care in Action: From Learning to Implementation in Health Systems.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- Intelligence Architectures and Machine Learning Applications in Contemporary Spine Care.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring nurse perspectives on AI-based shift scheduling for fairness, transparency, and work-life balance.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Current Perspectives on the Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.Anesthesiology clinics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
39187696What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.