ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Salient magnetic resonance imaging findings in the differential diagnosis of benign, borderline and malignant ovarian mucinous tumors.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI features of ovarian metastases from appendiceal tumors and primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma: a comparative study.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Performance of MRI protocols for diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn mucinous ovarian tumors, preoperative prediction of histological subgroup is important for treatment approach. Therefore, we aimed to determine salient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and estimate optimal cut off values for quantitative features in differential diagnosis of benign, borderline and malignant mucinous ovarian tumors.
methodsBetween January 2011 and December 2021, preoperative MRI scans of 50 patients with mucinous ovarian tumors (n = 54) were evaluated retrospectively. MRI findings [size, signal intensity, contrast pattern, features of loculation, wall, septa and mural nodule (MN), diffusion restriction] were investigated. There were benign, borderline, and malignant groups based on histopathological results. The relationship between radiological and histopathological results was analyzed by performing Kruskal Wallis test, Pearson's chi-squared test, receiver operating characteristic analysis.
resultsIn our study, there were 54 mucinous ovarian tumors in 50 patients. Of 54, 33 were benign, 13 borderline and eight malignant tumors. In comparison of three groups, tumor size, number of loculation, number and frequency of MN were higher and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value were lower in malignant group (p < 0.05). Septa thickness was lower with optimal cut off value of 2.45 mm in benign group compared to borderline and malignant groups [sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 75%, AUC (Area under the curve): 0.861] (p < 0.05). T2-weighted (T2-w) signal intensity ratio (SIR) of MN was higher in borderline compared to malignant group, with a cut-off value of 3.9 (sensitivity: 85%, specificity: 83%, AUC: 0.943) (p < 0.05). Ascites was also significant in malignant group (p < 0.05).
conclusionT2-w SIR of MN with a cut off value of 3.9 is beneficial for differential diagnosis. By awareness of some salient MRI findings (size, septa thickness, number of loculation, number and T2-w SIR of MN, ADC value and ascites), preoperative prediction of histological subgroup of mucinous tumors for appropriate treatment planning is possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39187694What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.