Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187647›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2025

The Role of Interactional Processes in Mental Health Disparities: A Narrative Review of Existing Research and Recommendations for Providers.

Bernalyn Ruiz-Yu, H Wenwen Ni, Emily He

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernalyn Ruiz-YuDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. bernalyn.ruizyu@childrens.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3267-6171
H Wenwen NiDepartment of Psychology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA, USA.
Emily HeDepartment of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA.

Funding

Clinical Research Training in Schizophrenia and Other PsychosesT32MH122395 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KEITH H NUECHTERLEIN · 2021 to 2026
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH122395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health disparities between racial/ethnic minority groups and non-Latinx Whites in the United States persist despite significant efforts aimed at decreasing these disparities. Efforts to address mental health disparities have largely focused on individual (e.g., stigma, help-seeking, health behaviors) and structural (e.g., public policy, interventions, addressing poverty) level factors. In contrast, this paper considers how processes at the interactional level (i.e., interactions between patients and providers) are also an important contributor to racial/ethnic disparities in mental health. Specifically, social psychological research has demonstrated how biases, including stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination, can affect patient-provider interactions and contribute to mental health disparities. This narrative review of empirical studies that examine interactional processes between patients and mental health providers identified eleven studies to be included. Concepts represented in the studies are summarized and additional frameworks that can help explain how disparities are maintained are proposed. Last of all, practical suggestions for mitigating provider bias during patient-provider interactions are provided based on the findings from the narrative review.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesMental DisordersProfessional-Patient RelationsHumansMinority GroupsUnited StatesInteractional processesMental healthProvider biasRacial/ethnic disparitiesSocial psychology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.