Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187610›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2024

The genetic architecture of repeated local adaptation to climate in distantly related plants.

James R Whiting, Tom R Booker, Clément Rougeux, Brandon M Lind, Pooja Singh, Mengmeng Lu, Kaichi Huang, Michael C Whitlock, Sally N Aitken, Rose L Andrew and 30 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The dynamics of introgression and parallel adaptation across North AmericanProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genomic history and ecology of local adaptation in sky-islandbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Large future genetic diversity losses are predicted from conservation indicators even with habitat protection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

James R WhitingDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. jwhiting2315@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-4991
Tom R BookerDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
Clément RougeuxDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Brandon M LindDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Pooja SinghDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mengmeng LuDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5023-3759
Kaichi HuangDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0378-5988
Michael C WhitlockDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0782-1843
Sally N AitkenDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-3625
Rose L AndrewSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0099-8336
Justin O BorevitzResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Jeremy J BruhlSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
Timothy L CollinsDepartment of Planning and Environment, Queanbeyan, New South Wales, Australia.
Martin C FischerETH Zurich: Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1888-1809
Kathryn A HodginsSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2795-5213
Jason A HollidayDepartment of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Pär K IngvarssonDepartment of Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9225-7521
Jasmine K JanesBiology Department, Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-2087
Momena KhandakerSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
Daniel KoenigDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1037-5346
Julia M KreinerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Antoine KremerUMR BIOGECO, INRAE, Université de Bordeaux; 69 Route d'Arcachon, Cestas, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-3235
Martin LascouxProgram in Plant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1699-9042
Thibault LeroyGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2259-9723
Pascal MilesiProgram in Plant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-4291
Kevin D MurrayResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2466-1917
Tanja PyhäjärviDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-5172
Christian RellstabSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0221-5975
Loren H RiesebergDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2712-2417
Fabrice RouxLaboratoire des Interactions Plantes-Microbes-Environnement, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-5638
John R StinchcombeDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-2964
Ian R H TelfordSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
Marco TodescoDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6227-4096
Jaakko S TyrmiDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Baosheng WangSouth China National Botanical Garden, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0934-1659
Detlef WeigelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2114-7963
Yvonne WilliDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Stephen I WrightDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9973-9697
Lecong ZhouDepartment of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Sam YeamanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Samuel.yeaman@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-8699

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Closely related species often use the same genes to adapt to similar environments. However, we know little about why such genes possess increased adaptive potential and whether this is conserved across deeper evolutionary lineages. Adaptation to climate presents a natural laboratory to test these ideas, as even distantly related species must contend with similar stresses. Here, we re-analyse genomic data from thousands of individuals from 25 plant species as diverged as lodgepole pine and Arabidopsis (~300 Myr). We test for genetic repeatability based on within-species associations between allele frequencies in genes and variation in 21 climate variables. Our results demonstrate significant statistical evidence for genetic repeatability across deep time that is not expected under randomness, identifying a suite of 108 gene families (orthogroups) and gene functions that repeatedly drive local adaptation to climate. This set includes many orthogroups with well-known functions in abiotic stress response. Using gene co-expression networks to quantify pleiotropy, we find that orthogroups with stronger evidence for repeatability exhibit greater network centrality and broader expression across tissues (higher pleiotropy), contrary to the 'cost of complexity' theory. These gene families may be important in helping wild and crop species cope with future climate change, representing important candidates for future study.

Indexed as

ClimateAdaptation, PhysiologicalArabidopsisPinus

Identifiers

PMID39187610
PMCPMC11461274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.