Observational studyAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Long-Term Assessment of Aesthetic Results in Omphalocele Repair with POSAS Scale.
Observational study in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOmphalocele (OM) is a congenital defect of the abdominal wall. The main goal of the surgical management is the survival of the neonate. However, the residual scar following the surgery can be extremely burdensome and negatively impact the quality of life (QoL) of these patients. The aim of this study is to assess the cosmetic results of the surgical treatment, the level of satisfaction of patients and surgeons, and the influence of the scar on the QoL of the patient. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted an observational retrospective cross-sectional study collecting all data regarding patients born with OM, operated at our Centre between 1998 and 2021. The cosmetic results of the surgical repair were evaluated using the validated Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The assessment of the quality of life determined by the presence of the scar was conducted using PedQL 4.0. At last, the patients were visited by two paediatric surgeons and a medical student, which then scored the cosmetic result of the scar. Statistical analysis was conducted with Spearman linear correlation and Mann-Whitney test. A P-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsIn our study, we included a total of 19 patients, with a mean of 12 years of age at the time of the evaluation. The parameters with the major influence on the patient's general opinion of the scar were stiffness, thickness, and irregularity. We discovered significant differences in median values of all scores between the giant OM group and the nongiant OM group, in favour of the latter. Finally, we found a low grade of concordance between PedsQL filled by parents and patients.
conclusionThe POSAS scale is a valid, feasible, and reliable tool for the assessment of the aesthetic outcome of surgical procedures. The original size of the defect is the most important factor acting on the result. However, it is crucial that any decision on plastic surgery to improve the looks of the scar must be postponed to the adult age of the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.