Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187587›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024

Mandibular Gender Dimorphism: The Utility of Artificial Intelligence and Statistical Shape Modeling in Skeletal Facial Analysis.

Jess D Rames, Sara M Hussein, Abdallah A Shehab, Alexandre M Pazelli, Victoria A Sears, Adam J Wentworth, Jonathan M Morris, Basel A Sharaf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jess D RamesDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sara M HusseinDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abdallah A ShehabDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alexandre M PazelliDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA.
Victoria A SearsAnatomic Modeling Lab, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Adam J WentworthAnatomic Modeling Lab, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jonathan M MorrisAnatomic Modeling Lab, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Basel A SharafDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA. Sharaf.Basel@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8584-2220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn gender-affirming surgery, facial skeletal dimorphism is an important topic for every craniofacial surgeon. Few cephalometric studies have assessed this topic; however, they fall short to provide skeletal contour insights that direct surgical planning. Herein, we propose statistical shape modeling (SSM) as a novel tool for investigating mandibular dimorphism for young white individuals.

methodsA single-center, retrospective study was performed using computed tomography (CT) scans of white individuals, aged 20 to 39 years old. AI-assisted, three-dimensional (3D) mandibles were reconstructed in Materialise Mimics v25.0. We used SSM to generate average 3D models for both genders. Relevant manual anthropometric measurements were taken for the SSMs and individual mandibles. Contour disparities were then represented using 3D overlays and heatmaps. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired student t testing or Wilcoxon signed rank testing with 95% confidence interval as deemed appropriate by population-level normality assessment.

resultsNinety-eight patients (53 females, 45 males) were included. Male mandibles showed greater bigonial width, intercondylar width, ramus height, and body length [p<0.005]. There was no statistically significant difference in the gonial angle measurements [p=0.62]. All relevant manual individual measurements demonstrated excellent concordance to their SSM counterparts. The 3D overlays of SSMs revealed squarer male chins with more lateral but less anterior projection than their female counterparts. Also, the female mandibles showed smoother transition at the gonial angle.

conclusionsSSM provides a novel tool to objectively evaluate volumetric and contour dimorphisms between genders. Moreover, this method can be automated, allowing for expedited comparisons between populations of interest compared to manual assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 . Bullet points about the importance of this work: Advancing Anthropometric Assessment: Statistical shape modeling (SSM) offers a cutting-edge approach to visualizing gender-specific skeletal anatomic differences for aesthetic and gender-affirming facial surgery. Expediting Comparative Analysis: The workflow established in this paper streamlines the evaluative process, enabling rapid morphologic comparisons between populations. Patient-Centered Care: This study establishes a foundation for the development of SSMs in individualized operative planning.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCephalometryImaging, Three-DimensionalMandibleTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultFemaleHumansMaleModels, StatisticalRetrospective StudiesSex CharacteristicsYoung AdultGender affirmation surgeryGender dimorphismMandibular contourSexual dimorphismStatistical shape modeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.