ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhanced machine learning approaches for OSA patient screening: model development and validation study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance of AI-Based Screening Tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Across Apnea-Hypopnea Index Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Development and Explainable Machine Learning Validation of a Novel Sleep Disturbance Ratio for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Three-class obstructive sleep apnea severity assessment: a parallel AHI and ODI explainable artificial intelligence framework using craniofacial-enriched clinical data.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Critically Ill Patients: A Structured Narrative Review of Prevalence, Diagnostic Barriers, and Clinical Implications in the ICU.Clocks & sleep · 2026Review
- Advancements, challenges, and prospects of explainable AI in sleep disordered breathing.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Identifying Hypertension Status in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- An end-to-end framework for data lineage analysis covering link pattern recognition, fault diagnosis, and early warning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating Complete Blood Count Parameters with Demographic Characteristics for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Prediction in Chinese Adults: A Machine Learning Approach.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- ACF-SAP: A machine learning framework for predicting obstructive sleep apnea severity using anthropometric and clinical features.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Outpatient Primary Care: A Scoping Review on Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in surgical planning and outcome prediction for obstructive sleep apnea: emerging hype or the future standard?Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Review
- Radar-Based Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Across Frequency Bands.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Big data approaches for novel mechanistic insights on sleep and circadian rhythms: a workshop summary.Sleep · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for sleep disorders among pregnant women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Analysis of upper airway CT-based radiomics in adult obstructive sleep apnea.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Predi̇cti̇ng the severi̇ty of obstructi̇ve sleep apnea usi̇ng arti̇fi̇ci̇al intelli̇gence tools.Annals of thoracic medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and mean heart rate during sleep were found to be risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and a variety of methods have been applied to predict the occurrence of OSA. This study aimed to develop and evaluate OSA prediction models using simple and accessible parameters, combined with multiple machine learning algorithms, and integrate them into a cloud-based mobile sleep medicine management platform for clinical use. The study data were obtained from the clinical records of 610 patients who underwent polysomnography (PSG) at the Sleep Medicine Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University between January 2021 and December 2022. The participants were randomly divided into a training-test group (80%) and an independent validation group (20%). The logistic regression, artificial neural network, naïve Bayes, support vector machine, random forest, and decision tree algorithms were used with age, gender, BMI, and mean heart rate during sleep as predictors to build a risk prediction model for moderate-to-severe OSA. To evaluate the performance of the models, we calculated the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), accuracy, recall, specificity, precision, and F1-score for the independent validation set. In addition, the calibration curve, decision curve, and clinical impact curve were generated to determine clinical usefulness. Age, gender, BMI, and mean heart rate during sleep were significantly associated with OSA. The artificial neural network model had the best efficacy compared with the other prediction algorithms. The AUROC, accuracy, recall, specificity, precision, F1-score, and Brier score were 80.4% (95% CI 76.7-84.1%), 69.9% (95% CI 69.8-69.9%), 86.5% (95% CI 81.6-91.3%), 61.5% (95% CI 56.6-66.4%), 53.2% (95% CI 47.7-58.7%), 65.9% (95% CI 60.2-71.5%), and 0.165, respectively, for the artificial neural network model. The AUROCs for the LR, NB, SVM, RF, and DT models were 80.2%, 79.7%, 79.2%, 78.4%, and 70.4%, respectively. The six models based on four simple and easily accessible parameters effectively predicted moderate-to-severe OSA in patients with PSG screening, with the artificial neural network model having the best performance. These models can provide a reliable tool for early OSA diagnosis, and their integration into a cloud-based mobile sleep medicine management platform could improve clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.