Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187569›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Enhanced machine learning approaches for OSA patient screening: model development and validation study.

Rongrong Dai, Kang Yang, Jiajing Zhuang, Ling Yao, Yiming Hu, Qingquan Chen, Huaxian Zheng, Xi Zhu, Jianfeng Ke, Yifu Zeng and 4 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Artificial intelligence in surgical planning and outcome prediction for obstructive sleep apnea: emerging hype or the future standard?Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rongrong Dai *The Sleep Disorder Medicine Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Kang Yang *The School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China.
Jiajing Zhuang *The School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China.
Ling YaoThe School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China.
Yiming HuThe School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China.
Qingquan ChenThe School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China.
Huaxian ZhengThe School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China.
Xi ZhuThe School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China.
Jianfeng KeThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Yifu ZengCyberspace Institute of Advanced Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510030, Guangdong, China.
Chunmei FanThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Xiaoyang ChenThe Sleep Disorder Medicine Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Jimin FanThe Sleep Disorder Medicine Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Yixiang ZhangThe Sleep Disorder Medicine Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China. zhangyixiang@fjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Fujian Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission 2021GG01010048Fujian Provincial University students' innovation and entrepreneurship training program project No.S 202210392005SNatural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2022J01792Quanzhou Science and Technology Project 2021C061R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and mean heart rate during sleep were found to be risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and a variety of methods have been applied to predict the occurrence of OSA. This study aimed to develop and evaluate OSA prediction models using simple and accessible parameters, combined with multiple machine learning algorithms, and integrate them into a cloud-based mobile sleep medicine management platform for clinical use. The study data were obtained from the clinical records of 610 patients who underwent polysomnography (PSG) at the Sleep Medicine Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University between January 2021 and December 2022. The participants were randomly divided into a training-test group (80%) and an independent validation group (20%). The logistic regression, artificial neural network, naïve Bayes, support vector machine, random forest, and decision tree algorithms were used with age, gender, BMI, and mean heart rate during sleep as predictors to build a risk prediction model for moderate-to-severe OSA. To evaluate the performance of the models, we calculated the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), accuracy, recall, specificity, precision, and F1-score for the independent validation set. In addition, the calibration curve, decision curve, and clinical impact curve were generated to determine clinical usefulness. Age, gender, BMI, and mean heart rate during sleep were significantly associated with OSA. The artificial neural network model had the best efficacy compared with the other prediction algorithms. The AUROC, accuracy, recall, specificity, precision, F1-score, and Brier score were 80.4% (95% CI 76.7-84.1%), 69.9% (95% CI 69.8-69.9%), 86.5% (95% CI 81.6-91.3%), 61.5% (95% CI 56.6-66.4%), 53.2% (95% CI 47.7-58.7%), 65.9% (95% CI 60.2-71.5%), and 0.165, respectively, for the artificial neural network model. The AUROCs for the LR, NB, SVM, RF, and DT models were 80.2%, 79.7%, 79.2%, 78.4%, and 70.4%, respectively. The six models based on four simple and easily accessible parameters effectively predicted moderate-to-severe OSA in patients with PSG screening, with the artificial neural network model having the best performance. These models can provide a reliable tool for early OSA diagnosis, and their integration into a cloud-based mobile sleep medicine management platform could improve clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPolysomnographySleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultAgedAlgorithmsBody Mass IndexFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRisk FactorsROC CurveMachine learningMobile sleep medicine management platformObstructive sleep apneaPolysomnographyPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID39187569
PMCPMC11347604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.