Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187568›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2024

Digital twins in dermatology, current status, and the road ahead.

Hossein Akbarialiabad, Amirmohammad Pasdar, Dédée F Murrell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Digital Twin Pathology of Skin Cancer.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025
    Article
  8. Enhancing randomized clinical trials with digital twins.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hossein AkbarialiabadFaculty of Medicine, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Amirmohammad PasdarSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5071-5803
Dédée F MurrellFaculty of Medicine, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. d.murrell@unsw.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital twins, innovative virtual models synthesizing real-time biological, environmental, and lifestyle data, herald a new era in personalized medicine, particularly dermatology. These models, integrating medical-purpose Internet of Things (IoT) devices, deep and digital phenotyping, and advanced artificial intelligence (AI), offer unprecedented precision in simulating real-world physical conditions and health outcomes. Originating in aerospace and manufacturing for system behavior prediction, their application in healthcare signifies a paradigm shift towards patient-specific care pathways. In dermatology, digital twins promise enhanced diagnostic accuracy, optimized treatment plans, and improved patient monitoring by accommodating the unique complexities of skin conditions. However, a comprehensive review across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus until February 5th, 2024, underscores a significant research gap; no direct studies on digital twins' application in dermatology is identified. This gap signals challenges, including the intricate nature of skin diseases, ethical and privacy concerns, and the necessity for specialized algorithms. Overcoming these barriers through interdisciplinary efforts and focused research is essential for realizing digital twins' potential in dermatology. This study advocates for a proactive exploration of digital twins, emphasizing the need for a tailored approach to dermatological care that is as personalized as the patients themselves.

Identifiers

PMID39187568
PMCPMC11347578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.