Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187507›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Structure prediction of alternative protein conformations.

Patrick Bryant, Frank Noé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. ConforFold recovers alternative protein conformations beyond MSA subsampling.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  15. Fold-Switching Proteins.Annual review of biophysics · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Bias in the AlphaFold3 prediction of ligand-induced domain motion in enzymes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick BryantDepartment of Mathematics and Informatics, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 12, 14195, Berlin, Germany. patrick.bryant@scilifelab.se.ORCID 0000-0003-3439-1866
Frank NoéDepartment of Mathematics and Informatics, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 12, 14195, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4169-9324

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) SFB 1114 projects A04 and C03, RTG 2433 Project Q04, SFB/TRR 186 Project A12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are dynamic molecules whose movements result in different conformations with different functions. Neural networks such as AlphaFold2 can predict the structure of single-chain proteins with conformations most likely to exist in the PDB. However, almost all protein structures with multiple conformations represented in the PDB have been used while training these models. Therefore, it is unclear whether alternative protein conformations can be genuinely predicted using these networks, or if they are simply reproduced from memory. Here, we train a structure prediction network, Cfold, on a conformational split of the PDB to generate alternative conformations. Cfold enables efficient exploration of the conformational landscape of monomeric protein structures. Over 50% of experimentally known nonredundant alternative protein conformations evaluated here are predicted with high accuracy (TM-score > 0.8).

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsComputational BiologyNeural Networks, ComputerProteins

Identifiers

PMID39187507
PMCPMC11347660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.