ArticleClinical implant dentistry and related research2024
Maxillary sinus membrane perforation rate utilizing osseodensification-mediated transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A multicenter clinical study.
Article in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Incidence and Associated Factors of Schneiderian Membrane Perforation in Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: A Meta-Analysis.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Incidence of sinus membrane perforation in transcrestal graftless maxillary sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of Schneiderian membrane perforation on vertical bone gain in transalveolar sinus lift procedures: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Histological and histomorphometric assessment of lateral window sinus augmentation in severe maxillary atrophy using a mixed allograft with β-TCP/HA and autologous platelet-rich fibrin.BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Automated detection and classification of maxillary sinus variations using slice-based and full-volume CBCT deep learning models.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Radiographic changes in the maxillary sinus following closed sinus augmentation.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Article
- Fractal analysis of peri-implant trabecular bone complexity following transcrestal sinus floor elevation: a retrospective radiographic study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Real-Time Motion Compensation for Dynamic Dental Implant Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Simple technique using ridge spreaders to safely perform a transcrestal sinus floor elevation: a technical note.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2025Article
- Dental Implant Rehabilitation of Posterior Maxillary Edentulism via Sinus Augmentation Using the Lateral Window Technique: A Retrospective Analysis of 289 Implants Followed Up for 15 Years.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Osseodensification technique in crestal maxillary sinus elevation-A narrative review.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2025Review
- Maxillary sinus membrane perforation rate utilizing osseodensification-mediated transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A multicenter clinical study.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis multicenter cross-sectional clinical study aimed to evaluate the membrane perforation rate during transcrestal sinus floor elevation (TSFE) using osseodensification (OD) burs and assess risk factors associated with the procedure. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted in six centers, following ethical standards and approved by local committees. It included patients over 18 years old missing maxillary posterior teeth with crestal residual bone height (RBH) ≥2 and ≤6 mm. Preoperative evaluations were done, including CBCT scans, to assess bone dimensions and sinus health. All centers and surgeons followed a standardized surgical protocol for TSFE using OD burs. Surgical complications, particularly sinus membrane perforations, were recorded and analyzed. Factors such as implant site, premolars or molars, as well as, healed or fresh socket, along with initial RBH were evaluated for their impact on membrane perforation rate. Descriptive statistics, χ
resultsA total of 621 subjects with an average age of 57.9 years were included. Sinus lifting was performed at 670 sites, with 621 implants placed in the maxilla. The majority of sinus lifts were done in the molar region (76.87%) and in healed bone sites (74.33%). The average RBH was 5.1 mm (ranging from 2 to 7 mm). Sinus membrane perforation occurred in 49 cases (7.31%). RBH ≤3 mm posed a risk factor for sinus membrane perforations followed by RBH >3 and ≤5 mm. Tooth region and implant site were not associated as risk factors for sinus membrane perforation.
conclusionOD drilling used for TSFE resulted in low membrane perforation rate. Challenging scenarios of severe posterior maxillary atrophy presented as risk factors for increased perforation rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.