Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39186774›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Evaluating the Implementation of Integrated Proactive Supportive Care Pathways in Oncology: Master Protocol for a Cohort Study.

Maria Alice Franzoi, Arnaud Pages, Loula Papageorgiou, Antonio Di Meglio, Ariane Laparra, Elise Martin, Aude Barbier, Nathalie Renvoise, Johanna Arvis, Florian Scotte and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06479057 (Integrating PROACTive Care Pathways to Empower and Support Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06479057 recruitingnot on this map

Integrating PROACTive Care Pathways to Empower and Support Cancer Patients (PROACT)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorGustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand ParisRan2024 to 2027Enrolled700ConditionsAny CancerArmsSupportive Care Pathway
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mobile Health (Cancer management and research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Alice FranzoiCancer Survivorship Group (INSERM U981), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2470-6054
Arnaud PagesDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-8693
Loula PapageorgiouInterdisciplinary Department for the Organization of Patient Pathways - DIOPP, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-2213
Antonio Di MeglioCancer Survivorship Group (INSERM U981), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0233-3189
Ariane LaparraInterdisciplinary Department for the Organization of Patient Pathways - DIOPP, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8275-7044
Elise MartinCancer Survivorship Group (INSERM U981), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9679-7226
Aude BarbierCancer Survivorship Group (INSERM U981), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0009-0006-4614-9312
Nathalie RenvoiseInterdisciplinary Department for the Organization of Patient Pathways - DIOPP, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0009-0001-8587-6495
Johanna ArvisCancer Survivorship Group (INSERM U981), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7956-421X
Florian ScotteInterdisciplinary Department for the Organization of Patient Pathways - DIOPP, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6175-7208
Ines Vaz-LuisCancer Survivorship Group (INSERM U981), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-2260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupportive care (SC) refers to the prevention and management of complications of cancer and its treatment. While it has long been recognized as an important cancer care delivery component, a high proportion of patients face unaddressed SC needs, calling for innovative approaches to deliver SC.

objectiveThe objective of this master protocol is to evaluate the implementation of different integrated proactive SC pathways across the cancer care continuum in our institution (Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France). Pathways studied in this master protocol may occur shortly after diagnosis to prevent treatment-related burden; during treatment to monitor the onset of toxicities and provide timely symptom management; and after treatment to improve rehabilitation, self-management skills, and social reintegration.

methodsThis study is guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of SC pathways on patients' distress and unmet needs after 12 weeks, measured by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Distress Thermometer and Problem List. Secondary objectives will focus on the pathways (macrolevel) and each SC intervention (microlevel), evaluating their reach (administrative data review of the absolute number and proportion of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients included in the pathways); short-term and long-term efficacy through their impact on quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and the 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire) and symptom burden (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Insomnia Severity Index, and 22-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Sexual Health Questionnaire); adoption by patients and providers (administrative data review of SC referrals and attendance or use of SC strategies); barriers to and leverage for implementation (surveys and focus groups with patients, providers, and the hospital organization); and maintenance (cost-consequence analysis). Pilot evaluations with a minimum of 70 patients per pathway will be performed to generate mean Distress Thermometer scores and SDs informing the calculation of formal sample size needed for efficacy evaluation (cohorts will be enriched accordingly).

resultsThe study was approved by the ethics committee, and as of February 2024, a total of 12 patients were enrolled.

conclusionsThis study will contribute toward innovative models of SC delivery and will inform the implementation of integrated SC pathways of care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06479057; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06479057. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/52841.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedQuality of Lifecare deliverycohort studyoncologypathway of carequality of lifesupportive care

Identifiers

PMID39186774
PMCPMC11384181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.