ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Assessing Drug Uptake and Response Differences in 2D and 3D Cellular Environments Using Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal live-cell chemical imaging using coherent Raman scattering microscopy.The Analyst · 2026Review
- Label-Free Imaging of Matrix Mineralization in Alginate-Encapsulated Bone Spheroids Using Coherent Raman Scattering Microscopy.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- The Next Frontier in Vibrational Imaging: Chemically Designed Raman Probes Pass the Spectral Barrier.JACS Au · 2026Review
- Article
- Biomimetic 3D-Bioprinted organoids of thymic epithelial tumors for translational drug screening and biomarker identification.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- An organoid-guided roadmap for precision delivery of epigallocatechin gallate in oral submucous fibrosis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Designing the matrix: extracellular matrix-informed strategies for bioengineered cancer models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Molecular Pathways Affected by Sulfonylpurine Derivatives in 2D and 3D HeLa Cell Models.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent advances in Raman probes for multiplexed bioimaging.Inflammation and regeneration · 2025Review
- Label-Free Longitudinal Imaging of Single Cell Drug Response with a 3D-Printed Cell Culture Platform.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Mechanodynamic brain on chip for studying human stem cell derived neuronal networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microfluidic Systems to Mimic the Blood-Brain Barrier: from Market to Engineering Challenges and Perspectives.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Dual Targeting EZH2 and Histone Deacetylases in Human Uterine Sarcoma Cells Under Both 2D and 3D Culture Conditions.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Illuminating life processes by vibrational probes.Nature methods · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The architecture of cell culture, two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D), significantly impacts various cellular factors, including cell-cell interactions, nutrient and oxygen gradients, metabolic activity, and gene expression profiles. This can result in different cellular responses during cancer drug treatment, with 3D-cultured cells often exhibiting higher resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. While various genetic and proteomic analyses have been employed to investigate the underlying mechanisms of this increased resistance, complementary techniques that provide experimental evidence of spatial molecular profiling data are limited. Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy has demonstrated its capability to measure both intracellular drug uptake and growth inhibition. In this work, we applied three-band (C-D, C-H, and fingerprint regions) SRS imaging to 2D and 3D cell cultures and performed a comparative analysis of drug uptake and response with the goal of understanding whether the difference in drug uptake explains the drug resistance in 3D culture compared to 2D. Our investigations revealed that despite similar intracellular drug levels in 2D and 3D A549 cells during lapatinib treatment, the growth of 3D spheroids was less impacted, supporting an enhanced drug tolerance in the 3D microenvironment. We further elucidated drug penetration patterns and the resulting heterogeneous cellular responses across different spheroid layers. Additionally, we investigated the role of the extracellular matrix in modulating drug delivery and cell response and discovered that limited drug penetration in 3D could also contribute to lower drug response. Our study provides valuable insights into the intricate mechanisms of increased drug resistance in 3D tumor models during cancer drug treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.