ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2025
Determining Individualized Foot Progression Angle for Reduction of Knee Medial Compartment Loading during Stepping.
Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimalist Footwear and Knee Joint Loading During Walking in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review of Evidence for Osteoarthritis Prevention.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in the biomechanics of knee osteoarthritis: biomechanical phenotyping, risk stratification, diagnosis, treatment and clinical translation-a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Effects of Subject-Specific Robot-Guided Off-Axis Stepping Training in Individuals With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- Off-axis biomechanical alterations and related interventions in medial knee osteoarthritis: a mini review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeModifying foot progression angle (FPA), the angle between the line from the heel to the second metatarsal head and the line of progression, can reduce peak knee adduction moment (pKAM). However, determining the optimal FPA that minimizes pKAM without inducing unnatural walking patterns can be challenging. This study investigated the FPA-pKAM relationship using a robotic stepping trainer to assess the feasibility of determining the optimal FPA based on this relationship. In addition, it examined knee moments during stepping with three different FPAs, as stepping is a recommended exercise for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation.
methodsTwenty-six asymptomatic individuals stepped on a robotic stepping trainer, which measured six-axis footplate-reaction forces/torques and three-dimensional ankle kinematics to determine external knee moments. The robot rotated the footplates slowly (~0.5 deg·s -1 ) between 10°-toe-out and 10°-toe-in while participants stepped continuously, unaware of the footplate rotations. The slope of pKAM-FPA relationship during continuous stepping was determined. Peak three-dimensional knee moments were compared between the 10°-toe-in, 0°-FPA, and 10°-toe-out FPAs with repeated-measures ANOVA. Multiple linear regression determined the covariates that predicted pKAM during stepping.
resultsEighteen participants had lower pKAM and KAM impulse with 10°-toe-in than 10°-toe-out ( P < 0.001) and 0°-FPA ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively; called toe-in responders). Conversely, eight participants reduced pKAM and KAM impulse with 10°-toe-out compared with 0°-FPA ( P < 0.001, P = 0.017) and 10°-toe-in ( P = 0.026, P = 0.004; called toe-out responders). A linear pKAM-FPA relationship was determined for each individual, and its slope (the pKAM rate with FPA) was positive for toe-in responders ( P < 0.01) and negative for toe-out responders ( P = 0.02). Regression analysis revealed that smaller pKAM with toe-in, in toe-in responders, was explained by increased tibia medial tilt, tibia internal rotation, footplate-reaction lateral force, footplate-reaction anterior force, and decreased footplate-reaction internal rotation torque.
conclusionsIndividuals may exhibit different responses to FPA modification during stepping. The slope and intercept of the linear pKAM-FPA relationship can be determined for individual subjects. This allows for a targeted pKAM reduction through guided FPA positioning and potentially offers subject-specific precision knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.