ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2024
From bench to in silico and backwards: What have we done on genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss and implantation failure and where should we go next?
Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Cellular senescence-related gene variants as risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Whole-Exome Sequencing in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Current Evidence and Future Directions in Saudi Arabia.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human reproduction goes through many challenges to its success and in many cases it fails. Cases of pregnancy loss are common outcomes for pregnancies, and implantation failures (IF) are common in assisted reproduction attempts. Although several risk factors have already been linked to adverse outcomes in reproduction, many cases remain without a definitive cause. Genetics of female reproduction is a field that may bring some pieces of this puzzle; however, there are no well-defined genes that might be related to the risk for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and IF. Here, we present a literature review of the studies of genetic association in RPL and IF carried out in the Brazilian population and complemented with a database search to explore genes previously related to RPL and IF, where a search for genes previously involved in these conditions was performed in OMIM, HuGE, and CTD databases. Finally, we present the next steps for reproductive genetics investigation, through genomic sequencing analyses and discuss future plans in the study of RPL genetics. The combined strategy of looking for literature and databases is useful to raise hypotheses and to identify underexplored genes related to RPL and IF.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.