Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39186654›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Large-scale genome sequencing of giant pandas improves the understanding of population structure and future conservation initiatives.

Tianming Lan, Shangchen Yang, Haimeng Li, Yi Zhang, Rengui Li, Sunil Kumar Sahu, Wenwen Deng, Boyang Liu, Minhui Shi, Shiqing Wang and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationships ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Tianming Lan *Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection (Ministry of Education), State Conservation Centre for Gene Resources of Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Shangchen Yang *Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection (Ministry of Education), State Conservation Centre for Gene Resources of Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8802-3028
Haimeng Li *Wildlife Evolution and Conservation Omics Laboratory, College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Yi Zhang *Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection (Ministry of Education), State Conservation Centre for Gene Resources of Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Rengui Li *Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration (State Park Administration) on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center of Giant Panda, Dujiangyan 611830, China.
Sunil Kumar SahuState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, BGI Research, Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen 518083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4742-9870
Wenwen DengKey Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration (State Park Administration) on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center of Giant Panda, Dujiangyan 611830, China.
Boyang LiuWildlife Evolution and Conservation Omics Laboratory, College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Minhui ShiState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, BGI Research, Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Shiqing WangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, BGI Research, Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Hanyu DuKey Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection (Ministry of Education), State Conservation Centre for Gene Resources of Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Xiaoyu HuangKey Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration (State Park Administration) on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center of Giant Panda, Dujiangyan 611830, China.
Haorong LuChina National GeneBank, BGI Research, Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Shanlin LiuKey Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Tao DengKey Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration (State Park Administration) on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center of Giant Panda, Dujiangyan 611830, China.
Jin ChenChina National GeneBank, BGI Research, Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Qing WangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, BGI Research, Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Lei HanWildlife Evolution and Conservation Omics Laboratory, College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Yajie ZhouState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, BGI Research, Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Qiye LiState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, BGI Research, Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Desheng LiKey Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration (State Park Administration) on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center of Giant Panda, Dujiangyan 611830, China.
Karsten KristiansenDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6024-0917
Qiu-Hong WanKey Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection (Ministry of Education), State Conservation Centre for Gene Resources of Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Huan LiuState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, BGI Research, Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Sheng-Guo FangKey Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection (Ministry of Education), State Conservation Centre for Gene Resources of Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2051-2516

Funding

Start-up Scientific Foundation of Northeast Forestry University 60201524043the Foundation of Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration (State Park Administration) on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park KLSFGAGP2020.002the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of the People's Republic of China none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extinction risk of the giant panda has been demoted from "endangered" to "vulnerable" on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, but its habitat is more fragmented than ever before, resulting in 33 isolated giant panda populations according to the fourth national survey released by the Chinese government. Further comprehensive investigations of the genetic background and in-depth assessments of the conservation status of wild populations are still necessary and urgently needed. Here, we sequenced the genomes of 612 giant pandas with an average depth of ~26× and generated a high-resolution map of genomic variation with more than 20 million variants covering wild individuals from six mountain ranges and captive representatives in China. We identified distinct genetic clusters within the Minshan population by performing a fine-grained genetic structure. The estimation of inbreeding and genetic load associated with historical population dynamics suggested that future conservation efforts should pay special attention to the Qinling and Liangshan populations. Releasing captive individuals with a genetic background similar to the recipient population appears to be an advantageous genetic rescue strategy for recovering the wild giant panda populations, as this approach introduces fewer deleterious mutations into the wild population than mating with differentiated lineages. These findings emphasize the superiority of large-scale population genomics to provide precise guidelines for future conservation of the giant panda.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGenomeUrsidaeAnimalsChinaEndangered SpeciesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationPopulation DynamicsWhole Genome Sequencingconservation geneticsgenetic structuregiant pandapopulation genomicspopulation history

Identifiers

PMID39186654
PMCPMC11388402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.