ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Language models align with human judgments on key grammatical constructions.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
- Do Language Models Know Who Did What to Whom?Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026Article
- Large Language Models as Distributional Baselines for Language Tasks.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026Article
- A Suite of LMs Comprehend Puzzle Statements as Well or Better Than Humans.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026Article
- Derivational morphology reveals analogical generalization in large language models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Transforming hematological research documentation with large language models: an approach to scientific writing and data analysis.Blood research · 2025Review
- Can Large Language Models Generate Useful Linguistic Corpora?: A Case Study of the Word Frequency Effect in Young German Readers.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025Article
- Article
- Testing AI on language comprehension tasks reveals insensitivity to underlying meaning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Reply to Hu et al.: Applying different evaluation standards to humans vs. Large Language Models overestimates AI performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.