Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39186640›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2025

Disruption and Improvisation: Experiences of Loneliness for People With Chronic Illness.

Melissa Mei Yin Cheung, Sophie Lewis, Revati Raja, Karen Willis, Leslie Dubbin, Anne Rogers, Maja Lindegaard Moensted, Lorraine Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa Mei Yin CheungSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7598-8648
Sophie LewisSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4639-217X
Revati RajaSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Karen WillisInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Leslie DubbinDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-5799
Anne RogersSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Maja Lindegaard MoenstedSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-1039
Lorraine SmithSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic illness can disrupt many aspects of life, including identity, social relationships, and anticipated life trajectories. Despite significant scholarship on chronic illness, we know less about the ways in which chronic illness impacts feelings of loneliness and how people with chronic illness deal with loneliness. Drawing on concepts of biographical disruption and liminality and data from walking and photo-elicitation interviews with 14 people, we aimed to explore how people with chronic illness experience loneliness in their everyday lives. Tracing how past and present illness experiences are implicated in the lived experience of loneliness and the strategies people use to manage loneliness, our findings illustrated that being caught in a liminal state where participants struggled to maintain and adapt to a new normality in life with chronic illness was a central thread woven throughout their experience of loneliness. Although participants drew on their personal agency and adopted strategies to account for, manage, and limit disruptions from chronic illness and loneliness, they found that their strategies were not completely effective or satisfactory. Chronic illness and loneliness continue to be largely considered as an individual's problem, limiting opportunities for people with chronic illness who experience loneliness to seek support and social connection. Our research highlighted that chronic illness and loneliness need to be acknowledged as both a personal and collective problem, with multi-level responses that involve individuals, communities, and society.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalLonelinessAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial Supportbiographical disruptionchronic illnessillness experiencesliminalitylonelinessphoto-elicitationqualitativewalking interviews

Identifiers

PMID39186640
PMCPMC11852523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.