Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39186638›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2025

Botulinum toxin A as a treatment modality for acute acquired comitant esotropia - An Indian perspective.

Akshay Badakere, Vibha Badrinath, Hennaav Kaur Dhillon, Abinaya Valliappan, Viswanathan Natarajan, Sumita Agarkar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07180394 (Botulinum Toxin for Strabismus Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07180394 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Botulinum Toxin for Strabismus Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorFoundation University IslamabadRan2025 to 2030Enrolled127ConditionsStrabismic Deviation, StrabismusArmsBotox injection into extraocular muscles
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk factors and predictors for botulinum toxin type A reinjection within six months in patients with acute acquired concomitant esotropia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Akshay BadakereDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vibha BadrinathDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Hennaav Kaur DhillonDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Abinaya ValliappanDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Viswanathan NatarajanDepartment of Biostatistics, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sumita AgarkarDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the outcomes of botulinum toxin A injection in acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE).

methodsThis is a retrospective study that included cases diagnosed as AACE between January 2022 and February 2023. Patients who were treated with Botox and completed a minimum 3 months follow-up were included in the study. All the patients underwent a complete ophthalmic, orthoptic examination and neuroimaging. The effects of age, onset of esotropia, screen time, deviation pre injection, mode of injection (transconjunctival/ open sky) and whether injection was administered in one/both eyes on successful outcome were analysed.

resultsTwenty-seven patients (20 male, seven female) were included in the study. The median age was 10 years. The median deviation for distance and near preinjection was 35 and 40 prism diopters, respectively. Complete resolution of symptoms was noted in 18 patients (66.6%). Four patients needed prisms, two required repeat injections, and one each needed surgery and divergence therapy. Six patients developed ptosis. None of the risk factors seemed to affect outcomes.

conclusionBotulinum toxin injected into the medial rectus is a safe and viable option for AACE. Preinjection counseling about ptosis, recurrence needing prisms, reinjection, or surgery is important.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AEsotropiaEye MovementsOculomotor MusclesVision, BinocularAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndiaInjections, IntramuscularMaleBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agents

Identifiers

PMID39186638
PMCPMC11991546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.