Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39186327›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2024

Clinicopathological features of hepatoid adenocarcinoma and non-hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qi Ling, Han-Lin Liu, Shi-Ting Huang, Li-Fei Sun, Wei-Wei Wu, Valentin Kudriashov, Kai Liu, Kun Yang, Jian-Kun Hu, Wei-Han Zhang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qi LingDepartment of General Surgery, Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Han-Lin LiuWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Shi-Ting HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Li-Fei SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wei-Wei WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Valentin KudriashovDepartment of General Surgery, Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Kai LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Kun YangDepartment of General Surgery, Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8891-5736
Jian-Kun HuDepartment of General Surgery, Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3294-3471
Wei-Han ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9498-8245

Funding

Medical Science and Technique Project of Health Commission of Sichuan Province 21PJ043Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province 2023NSFSC1847Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province 23NSFSC1611Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province 24ZDYF0399Sichuan University "From 0 to 1" innovative research project 2023SCUH0057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is an extremely rare and unique malignant gastric tumor with a significantly worse prognosis than non-hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (non-HAS). The present study explored the clinicopathological features of HAS and non-HAS patients to provide insights into HAS treatment strategies.

methodsFrom December 26, 2023, we performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase.com databases for relevant studies. Two authors independently screened the studies, evaluated their quality, extracted data, and performed the analyses. This study was registered with PROSPERO on January 2, 2024.

resultsNine retrospective studies were included for analysis after screening 833 articles. A total of 350 and 924 patients were enrolled in the HAS and non-HAS groups, respectively. While no significant differences were observed in age, sex, tumor size, T3 or T4 stage, and N2 or N3 stage between the two groups, the HAS group exhibited higher rates of lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.19-3.13, p = 0.007), liver metastasis (OR = 3.45, 95% CI: 2.26-5.28, p < 0.001), and vascular invasion (OR = 2.76, 95% CI: 2.05-3.71, p < 0.001). Additionally, the HAS group had lower 3-year survival rates (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.70-3.25, p < 0.001) and 5-year survival rates (HR = 3.63, 95% CI: 1.49-8.88, p = 0.005), but lower rates of lymphatic permeation (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.47-0.99, p = 0.040).

conclusionBased on the current clinical evidence, patients with HAS present distinct clinicopathological features, greater invasiveness, and poorer prognosis than non-HAS patients. Further research is warranted to develop optimal treatment strategies for HAS.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm StagingPrognosisclinicopathological featuresHepatoid adenocarcinomanon‐hepatoid adenocarcinomaprognosis

Identifiers

PMID39186327
PMCPMC11346349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.