Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39186209›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Generation (not production) improves the fidelity of visual representations in picture naming.

Jedidiah W Whitridge, Chris A Clark, Kathleen L Hourihan, Jonathan M Fawcett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. It's All About That Case.Experimental psychology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jedidiah W WhitridgeDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NF, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-4977
Chris A ClarkDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NF, Canada.
Kathleen L HourihanDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NF, Canada.
Jonathan M FawcettDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NF, Canada. jfawcett@mun.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production effect refers to the finding that participants better remember items read aloud than items read silently. This pattern has been attributed to aloud items being relatively more distinctive in memory than silent items, owing to the integration of additional sensorimotor features within the encoding episode that are thought to facilitate performance at test. Other theorists have instead argued that producing an item encourages additional forms of processing not limited to production itself. We tested this hypothesis using a modified production task where participants named monochromatic line drawings aloud or silently either by generating the names themselves (no label condition) or reading a provided label (label condition). During a later test, participants were presented with each line drawing a second time and required to reproduce the original color and location using a continuous slider. Production was found to improve memory for visual features, but only when participants were required to generate the label themselves. Our findings support the notion that picture naming improves memory for visual features; however, this benefit appears to be driven by factors related to response generation rather than production itself.

Indexed as

Mental RecallPattern Recognition, VisualReadingAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDistinctivenessGenerationMemoryProcessingProduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.