Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39186107›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2024

[The challenges for psychiatric care posed by synthetic drugs].

Norbert Scherbaum, Udo Bonnet

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Norbert ScherbaumLVR-Universitätsklinik Essen, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland. norbert.scherbaum@lvr.de.
Udo BonnetLVR-Universitätsklinik Essen, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn addition to the drugs that have been known for decades, several hundred mainly synthetic substances have been identified as drugs for the first time in the last 20 years. AIM OF THE WORK: Presentation of the various groups of substances and their psychotropic effects, the epidemiology of their use and the legal and social background of this development. MATERIAL: Narrative literature review.

resultsThe most important new psychoactive substances (NPS) are synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic stimulants (cathinones), halluginogens and new synthetic opioids (NSO), in particular fentanyl and related substances. The new substances do not have any qualitatively new psychotropic effects. They were brought onto the market in particular as substitutes for substances subject to the Narcotics Act but are often associated with dangerous side effects and even mortality. The increasing availability of these substances has gone hand in hand with the establishment of the Internet as a source of knowledge (e.g. for synthesis routes) and as a marketplace. Substance group-related regulations have also been established in Germany (New Psychoactive Substances Act). In Germany the prevalence of NPS use is significantly lower than that of cannabis; however, there are indications that the production and distribution of synthetic drugs is more profitable for drug dealers than with conventional plant-based drugs, such as heroin. In the USA, for example, NSOs are the primarily drugs used for opioid addiction. DISCUSSION: It remains to be seen whether NPS and NSOs will replace conventional drugs. The availability of synthetic drugs is more difficult to reduce than that of plant-based drugs. Harm reduction measures should be expanded, e.g., early warning systems for new drugs, drug checking and naloxone programs.

Indexed as

Psychotropic DrugsSubstance-Related DisordersSynthetic DrugsGermanyHumansIllicit DrugsMental DisordersIllicit DrugsPsychotropic DrugsSynthetic DrugsGlobalizationHarm reductionInternetNew psychoactive substancesNew synthetic opioids

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.