ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2024
Utility of special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) immunohistochemistry as a marker for secondary perianal paget disease.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A panel-based approach using immunohistochemistry (IHC) is currently used for subtyping perianal Paget disease (PPD) in the absence of a synchronous neoplasm. Special AT-rich Sequence Binding Protein 2 (SATB2) has been established as a sensitive and specific marker for lower gastrointestinal tract carcinomas. We evaluated its performance as a marker of secondary PPD. A panel of IHCs including CK7, CK20, GCDFP-15, CDX2, and SATB2 were performed on fifteen cases of PPD (identified between 1991-2001) and seven cases of primary vulvar Paget disease with perianal involvement. Eight cases (53%) were classified as secondary PPD based on the presence of a synchronous (n = 7) or a metachronous neoplasm (n = 1). There was no differential staining for CK7 (positive in 7/7 primary vs. 7/8 secondary PPD; P = 1.00) and CK20 (positive in 4/7 primary vs. 8/8 secondary PPD; P = .08). GCDFP-15 was positive in 5/7 cases of primary PPD while negative in all cases of secondary PPD (P = .01). CDX2 was positive in all cases of secondary PPD (P = .001) while SATB2 was positive in 7/8 cases of secondary PPD (P = .01). Both CDX2 and SATB2 were positive in 1/7 cases of primary PPD. The addition of an IHC panel in conjunction with clinical/imaging findings can help definitively classify PPD as either primary or secondary in most cases. We show that SATB2 has comparable performance to CDX2 and can be a helpful additional tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39186079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.