Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185735›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Distinct oscillatory patterns differentiate between segregation and integration processes in perceptual grouping.

Gabriel Nascimento Costa, Michael Schaum, João Valente Duarte, Ricardo Martins, Isabel Catarina Duarte, João Castelhano, Michael Wibral, Miguel Castelo-Branco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriel Nascimento CostaInstitute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Michael SchaumMEG Unit, Brain Imaging Center, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6589-4530
João Valente DuarteInstitute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8586-9554
Ricardo MartinsInstitute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-185X
Isabel Catarina DuarteInstitute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
João CastelhanoInstitute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Michael WibralMEG Unit, Brain Imaging Center, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Miguel Castelo-BrancoInstitute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4364-6373

Funding

BIAL Foundation 207/16Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, FCT 2022.02963.PTDCPortuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, FCT CEECIND/00581/2017Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, FCT DSAIPA/DS/0041/2020Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, FCT PTDC/PSI-GER/1326/2020Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, FCT UID/04950B/2020Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, FCT UID/04950P/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, there has been a resurgence in experimental and conceptual efforts to understand how brain rhythms can serve to organize visual information. Oscillations can provide temporal structure for neuronal processing and form a basis for integrating information across brain areas. Here, we use a bistable paradigm and a data-driven approach to test the hypothesis that oscillatory modulations associate with the integration or segregation of visual elements. Spectral signatures of perception of bound and unbound configurations of visual moving stimuli were studied using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in ambiguous and unambiguous conditions. Using a 2 × 2 design, we were able to isolate correlates from visual integration, either perceptual or stimulus-driven, from attentional and ambiguity-related activity. Two frequency bands were found to be modulated by visual integration: an alpha/beta frequency and a higher frequency gamma-band. Alpha/beta power was increased in several early visual cortical and dorsal visual areas during visual integration, while gamma-band power was surprisingly increased in the extrastriate visual cortex during segregation. This points to an integrative role for alpha/beta activity, likely from top-down signals maintaining a single visual representation. On the other hand, when more representations have to be processed in parallel gamma-band activity is increased, which is at odds with the notion that gamma oscillations are related to perceptual coherence. These modulations were confirmed in intracranial EEG recordings and partially originate from distinct brain areas. Our MEG and stereo-EEG data confirms predictions of binding mechanisms depending on low-frequency activity for long-range integration and for organizing visual processing while refuting a straightforward correlation between gamma-activity and perceptual binding. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Distinct neurophysiological signals underlie competing bistable percepts. Increased alpha/beta activity correlate with visual integration while gamma correlates with segmentation. Ambiguous percepts drive alpha/beta activity in the posterior cingulate cortex.

Indexed as

MagnetoencephalographyAdultAttentionBrain MappingBrain WavesFemaleGamma RhythmHumansMaleMotion PerceptionVisual CortexVisual PerceptionYoung Adultalpha and beta rhythmsgamma activityintracranial recordingsmagnetoencephalography (MEG)oscillationsperceptual bindingstereoEEG

Identifiers

PMID39185735
PMCPMC11345702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.