Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185700›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2024

Deep learning links localized digital pathology phenotypes with transcriptional subtype and patient outcome in glioblastoma.

Thomas Roetzer-Pejrimovsky, Karl-Heinz Nenning, Barbara Kiesel, Johanna Klughammer, Martin Rajchl, Bernhard Baumann, Georg Langs, Adelheid Woehrer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Applications and development of in situ nucleic acid visualization techniques.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas Roetzer-PejrimovskyDivision of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8875-7304
Karl-Heinz NenningCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1073-9891
Barbara KieselDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0939-9831
Johanna KlughammerGene Center and Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80539 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3628-9278
Martin RajchlDepartment of Computing and Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9635-0253
Bernhard BaumannCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6419-1932
Georg LangsComputational Imaging Research Lab, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5536-6873
Adelheid WoehrerDivision of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8435-8189

Funding

Austrian Science Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning has revolutionized medical image analysis in cancer pathology, where it had a substantial clinical impact by supporting the diagnosis and prognostic rating of cancer. Among the first available digital resources in the field of brain cancer is glioblastoma, the most common and fatal brain cancer. At the histologic level, glioblastoma is characterized by abundant phenotypic variability that is poorly linked with patient prognosis. At the transcriptional level, 3 molecular subtypes are distinguished with mesenchymal-subtype tumors being associated with increased immune cell infiltration and worse outcome.

resultsWe address genotype-phenotype correlations by applying an Xception convolutional neural network to a discovery set of 276 digital hematozylin and eosin (H&E) slides with molecular subtype annotation and an independent The Cancer Genome Atlas-based validation cohort of 178 cases. Using this approach, we achieve high accuracy in H&E-based mapping of molecular subtypes (area under the curve for classical, mesenchymal, and proneural = 0.84, 0.81, and 0.71, respectively; P < 0.001) and regions associated with worse outcome (univariable survival model P < 0.001, multivariable P = 0.01). The latter were characterized by higher tumor cell density (P < 0.001), phenotypic variability of tumor cells (P < 0.001), and decreased T-cell infiltration (P = 0.017).

conclusionsWe modify a well-known convolutional neural network architecture for glioblastoma digital slides to accurately map the spatial distribution of transcriptional subtypes and regions predictive of worse outcome, thereby showcasing the relevance of artificial intelligence-enabled image mining in brain cancer.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGlioblastomaPhenotypeHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisdeep learningdigital pathologyGlioblastomahistologyrisk score

Identifiers

PMID39185700
PMCPMC11345537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.