Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185695›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Precision fMRI and cluster-failure in the individual brain.

Igor Fabian Tellez Ceja, Thomas Gladytz, Ludger Starke, Karsten Tabelow, Thoralf Niendorf, Henning Matthias Reimann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Igor Fabian Tellez CejaMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-0541-9536
Thomas GladytzMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Berlin, Germany.
Ludger StarkeMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Berlin, Germany.
Karsten TabelowWeierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1274-9951
Thoralf NiendorfMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Berlin, Germany.
Henning Matthias ReimannMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1053-9256

Funding

European Research Council 743077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in neuroimaging acquisition protocols and denoising techniques, along with increasing magnetic field strengths, have dramatically improved the temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This permits spatial resolution with submillimeter voxel sizes and ultrahigh temporal resolution and opens a route toward performing precision fMRI in the brains of individuals. Yet ultrahigh spatial and temporal resolution comes at a cost: it reduces tSNR and, therefore, the sensitivity to the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) effect and other functional contrasts across the brain. Here we investigate the potential of various smoothing filters to improve BOLD sensitivity while preserving the spatial accuracy of activated clusters in single-subject analysis. We introduce adaptive-weight smoothing with optimized metrics (AWSOM), which addresses this challenge extremely well. AWSOM employs a local inference approach that is as sensitive as cluster-corrected inference of data smoothed with large Gaussian kernels, but it preserves spatial details across multiple tSNR levels. This is essential for examining whole-brain fMRI data because tSNR varies across the entire brain, depending on the distance of a brain region from the receiver coil, the type of setup, acquisition protocol, preprocessing, and resolution. We found that cluster correction in single subjects results in inflated family-wise error and false positive rates. AWSOM effectively suppresses false positives while remaining sensitive even to small clusters of activated voxels. Furthermore, it preserves signal integrity, that is, the relative activation strength of significant voxels, making it a valuable asset for a wide range of fMRI applications. Here we demonstrate these features and make AWSOM freely available to the research community for download.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultCluster AnalysisHumansOxygenSignal-To-Noise RatioOxygenadaptive weights smoothingBOLDcluster failurefMRIsingle‐subjectspatial accuracyspatial smoothing

Identifiers

PMID39185695
PMCPMC11345700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.